CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Directional loss model - describing a porous plate

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 20, 2012, 15:35
Default Directional loss model - describing a porous plate
  #1
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 10
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Greetings,

I am modeling a liquid domain which has a perforated plate. I know the streamwise directional loss coefficient but am having trouble estimating a realistic transverse loss coefficient. right now I'm just using 1/10 the streamwise coefficient, but am trying to see if I cane comehow describe it better.

Has anyone seen any good resources/papers to calculate the transverse loss coefficient, or have any experience?

I found one: "Compact CFD Modeling of EMC Screen for Radio Base Stations: A Porous Media Approach and a Correlation for the Directional Loss Coefficients", but it is for air and the study is very different than my flow characteristics.

Thanks in advance
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2012, 18:04
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,937
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
A perforated plate sounds thin. In that case there would be little thickness for the transverse flow to do anything. This means the transverse coefficient will not matter much.

I recommend you do a sensitivity analysis of it, and I suspect you will find that it will not make much difference, so you can enter anything within a wide range of the streamwise loss coefficient.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2012, 12:06
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 10
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply,
That was my thinking that it shouldn't have much effect on the transverse flow. I'll do the sensitivity study with 0%, 10% and 20% the flow restriction of the streamline direction.
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2013, 09:45
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Koen Stegeman
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 7
zegtuhetmaar is on a distinguished road
Did you have any result? I agree with flows coming with no angle of attack, but what about flows coming in with an angle of attack. Then it makes a difference when choosing directional loss.

My question is what should be this factor for 45º flows?
zegtuhetmaar is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2013, 11:11
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 11
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by evcelica
I am modeling a liquid domain which has a perforated plate. I know the streamwise directional loss coefficient but am having trouble estimating a realistic transverse loss coefficient. right now I'm just using 1/10 the streamwise coefficient, but am trying to see if I cane comehow describe it better.
What is your t/d ratio? t being the thickness and d being the hole dia. If it is less than 0.015, you needn't worry about the transverse loss coefficient and just model it using the porous interface.

If it is more than 0.015, it is regarded as thick plate. And generally the transverse loss coefficient will be far larger than streamwise coefficient for thicker plates. I don't understand why you say that you will use 1/10th of the streamwise...

Quote:
Originally Posted by zegtuhetmaar
My question is what should be this factor for 45º flows?
How angle affects the loss coefficient strongly depends on t/d ratio, with perfs having larger t/d ratios affected more than smaller ones. Typically, upto 30 deg, the loss coefficients don't seem to affect much, but beyond that, it increases rapidly, the rate depending on t/d ratio, of course.

OJ
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternative modeling of an perforated plate (not as a porous medium) airflow CFX 1 March 1, 2012 18:07
Directional loss model Claudia CFX 3 February 8, 2007 21:15
on porous momentum model yuan CFX 0 March 11, 2006 05:47
Directional loss model Cenci CFX 6 December 20, 2005 15:33
turbulence at a porous jump (perforated plate) andrew FLUENT 1 May 8, 2004 09:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:21.