how to split a surface in CFX POST

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 24, 2012, 02:33 how to split a surface in CFX POST #1 Senior Member   mohammad Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Seoul, South korea Posts: 214 Rep Power: 8 Dear all, I have fnished the calculation of a blade...while meshing in the ICEM , I defined the blade surface as a single surface. Now I want to see the force and moment on some radial section of the blade, say from R1 to R2.... How can I split the blade surface in the CFX-POST to create that smaller surface? Thanks a lot

 July 24, 2012, 03:21 #2 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 12,715 Rep Power: 99 Yes, use isosurfaces of radius to define a new surface on your blade surface between your radii. Then you can do calculations on these new surfaces. You can also set this up using a contour tool, drawing contours of radius on your surface. Then you can extract the surface between contours as a user defined surface (I think that is correct).

July 24, 2012, 03:44
#3
Senior Member

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks Yes, use isosurfaces of radius to define a new surface on your blade surface between your radii. Then you can do calculations on these new surfaces. You can also set this up using a contour tool, drawing contours of radius on your surface. Then you can extract the surface between contours as a user defined surface (I think that is correct).
Dear Glenn,
The second method is correct....geometrically it gives the radially extended area.
But..about the first method... I am wondering after creating those two isosurfaces, how to create a surface between two radii( Iso-surfaces) on the blade?

Thanks

Last edited by mohammad; July 24, 2012 at 04:42.

 July 24, 2012, 04:41 Veryyyyyy Important and STRANGE.... #4 Senior Member   mohammad Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Seoul, South korea Posts: 214 Rep Power: 8 As a test to see the accuracy of the results, I divided a surface to n smaller part using the second method of Glenn... The results are dramatically different.... This might be because the integration algorithm and mesh size on the surface Vs. radial surfaces... To the readers: I will post more things as I understand the reason of this HUGE difference

 July 24, 2012, 19:31 #5 Super Moderator   Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 12,715 Rep Power: 99 The mesh on these sub-surfaces should just be the original mesh chopped up. The sum of the surface bits should equal the whole surface, and if not make a careful check you are doing this correctly.

July 24, 2012, 21:40
#6
Senior Member

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 8
Dear Glenn;
I in one of my files I have a blade whose surface is composed of 4 smaller surfaces. I tried with this file:

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks The mesh on these sub-surfaces should just be the original mesh chopped up.
I divided my blade radially to 100 small pieces, meaning each radial strip width equals to (1%* Blade Radius) . This method helped me to fit the newly created surfaces with high accuracy to one of those 4 surfaces which exist on blade surface. The surfaces overlap is nearly 95%.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghorrocks .... and if not make a careful check you are doing this correctly.
then I went to "Expression" and i created expressions for the Fx, Fy, Fz; one for that surface which originally belongs to the blade and one for all newly created radial surfaces...

Amazingly the results are different.....

To my knowledge, this could JUST be because of one thing.....when we create some surfaces on "CFX_POST" , the software might work with the interpolated data instead of those original nodal values and hence the results become different. This seems correct to me, because I have highly separated flow on the blade and high mesh density near the blades surface...thus i think the gradient values of the pressure are high in that area, which make the interpolation ( and thus the values on the new surfaces) erroneous.

To investigate this matter more, I created a flat plane and tried to use "Sample " method and " Slice" method. the results were different even with the change in "#of sample points" the results of "Sample" became different....

I would be very happy if these differences can be explained to me.

Regards,

Last edited by mohammad; July 24, 2012 at 23:03.

September 29, 2012, 09:59
#7
Senior Member

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 214
Rep Power: 8
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mohammad Dear all, I have fnished the calculation of a blade...while meshing in the ICEM , I defined the blade surface as a single surface. Now I want to see the force and moment on some radial section of the blade, say from R1 to R2.... How can I split the blade surface in the CFX-POST to create that smaller surface? Thanks a lot
Location> Iso clip
then define the radius as the varaiable and limit the "Iso clip" with R1 ,R2

 July 15, 2016, 03:18 #8 New Member   shubham jain Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 24 Rep Power: 4 Hello, I have a simulation of Turbine Stator for post processing in cfd post. Hub, shroud and stator blade walls are all defined as one part "Walls". I want to split the surface, and want to plot a contour only on the Hub wall. Or to split the surface, say starting from hub to very small span of blade near hub Actually I want to plot film cooling effectiveness, which I only need it on hub. Any ideas would be helpful thanks

 Tags cfx post, split a surface

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post EVBUCF OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 14 August 20, 2012 04:31 tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02 HMR CFX 5 March 9, 2011 23:33 ouafa Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 7 May 21, 2010 12:43 alex CFX 1 August 22, 2002 13:01

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30.