CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

how to split a surface in CFX POST

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 24, 2012, 02:33
Smile how to split a surface in CFX POST
  #1
Senior Member
 
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 7
mohammad is on a distinguished road
Dear all,
I have fnished the calculation of a blade...while meshing in the ICEM , I defined the blade surface as a single surface.

Now I want to see the force and moment on some radial section of the blade, say from R1 to R2....

How can I split the blade surface in the CFX-POST to create that smaller surface?

Thanks a lot
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2012, 03:21
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,665
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, use isosurfaces of radius to define a new surface on your blade surface between your radii. Then you can do calculations on these new surfaces.

You can also set this up using a contour tool, drawing contours of radius on your surface. Then you can extract the surface between contours as a user defined surface (I think that is correct).
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2012, 03:44
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 7
mohammad is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Yes, use isosurfaces of radius to define a new surface on your blade surface between your radii. Then you can do calculations on these new surfaces.

You can also set this up using a contour tool, drawing contours of radius on your surface. Then you can extract the surface between contours as a user defined surface (I think that is correct).
Dear Glenn,
First of all, thanks for your useful reply.
The second method is correct....geometrically it gives the radially extended area.
But..about the first method... I am wondering after creating those two isosurfaces, how to create a surface between two radii( Iso-surfaces) on the blade?

Thanks

Last edited by mohammad; July 24, 2012 at 04:42.
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2012, 04:41
Smile Veryyyyyy Important and STRANGE....
  #4
Senior Member
 
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 7
mohammad is on a distinguished road
As a test to see the accuracy of the results, I divided a surface to n smaller part using the second method of Glenn...
The results are dramatically different.... This might be because the integration algorithm and mesh size on the surface Vs. radial surfaces...

To the readers:
I will post more things as I understand the reason of this HUGE difference
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2012, 19:31
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,665
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The mesh on these sub-surfaces should just be the original mesh chopped up. The sum of the surface bits should equal the whole surface, and if not make a careful check you are doing this correctly.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 24, 2012, 21:40
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 7
mohammad is on a distinguished road
Dear Glenn;
I in one of my files I have a blade whose surface is composed of 4 smaller surfaces. I tried with this file:


Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
The mesh on these sub-surfaces should just be the original mesh chopped up.
I divided my blade radially to 100 small pieces, meaning each radial strip width equals to (1%* Blade Radius) . This method helped me to fit the newly created surfaces with high accuracy to one of those 4 surfaces which exist on blade surface. The surfaces overlap is nearly 95%.



Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
.... and if not make a careful check you are doing this correctly.
then I went to "Expression" and i created expressions for the Fx, Fy, Fz; one for that surface which originally belongs to the blade and one for all newly created radial surfaces...

Amazingly the results are different.....

To my knowledge, this could JUST be because of one thing.....when we create some surfaces on "CFX_POST" , the software might work with the interpolated data instead of those original nodal values and hence the results become different. This seems correct to me, because I have highly separated flow on the blade and high mesh density near the blades surface...thus i think the gradient values of the pressure are high in that area, which make the interpolation ( and thus the values on the new surfaces) erroneous.


To investigate this matter more, I created a flat plane and tried to use "Sample " method and " Slice" method. the results were different even with the change in "#of sample points" the results of "Sample" became different....

I would be very happy if these differences can be explained to me.

Regards,

Last edited by mohammad; July 24, 2012 at 23:03.
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 29, 2012, 09:59
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
mohammad
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Seoul, South korea
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 7
mohammad is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohammad View Post
Dear all,
I have fnished the calculation of a blade...while meshing in the ICEM , I defined the blade surface as a single surface.

Now I want to see the force and moment on some radial section of the blade, say from R1 to R2....

How can I split the blade surface in the CFX-POST to create that smaller surface?

Thanks a lot
Location> Iso clip
then define the radius as the varaiable and limit the "Iso clip" with R1 ,R2
mohammad is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx post, split a surface

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Layers don't fully surround surface EVBUCF OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 14 August 20, 2012 04:31
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 August 5, 2011 16:02
viewing cfx post while working on cfx solver manager HMR CFX 5 March 9, 2011 23:33
boundaries with gmshToFoam‏ ouafa Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 7 May 21, 2010 12:43
creating expresions in cfx build or cfx post alex CFX 1 August 22, 2002 13:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:24.