CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

How to Apply Rotational Wall BC

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 25, 2012, 18:27
Default How to Apply Rotational Wall BC
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
tango711 is on a distinguished road
Hello all,

I am attempting to apply a rotational wall boundary condition to a certain domain but when I do I get an error which says:

| ERROR #002100080 has occurred in subroutine CHECK_NORMV.
| Message:
| The specified velocity vector on the boundary patch
|
| Boundary 3
|
| has a significant normal component at one or more faces. One of
| these face locations is
|
| (x,y,z) = ( 1.53317E-01, 3.92873E-02, 1.37851E-02).
|
| The angle between the specified velocity and the element surface is
| 87.996 degrees at this face. This is considered an error because
| it implies that the mesh is moving. The following are possible
| reasons for the error message:
| 1. There is a setup error; for example, an incorrect axis of
| rotation.
| 2. There may be a meshing problem; for example, the nodes on a
| rotating surface might not lie on the surface of revolution.
| 3. The boundary is curved and the mesh is very coarse. In this
| case, you may modify the tolerance by increasing the
| expert parameter 'tangential vector tolerance wall'
| from its default of 20 degrees.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+


I have attached pictures of the troublesome part of the domain I am using. I think it is because there is a wall which is radial, thus the tangential vector would be normal to it (The angle given is almost 90 degrees in this case, I am not sure if I can change the expert parameter to that much), how can I solve this?

I double checked and I am sure that the axis of rotation is correct and that the mesh quality is fine.

Best regards,

Tango
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Figure 1.jpg (62.6 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg Figure 2.jpg (84.3 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg Figure 3.jpg (26.5 KB, 29 views)
tango711 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2012, 01:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,104
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
There is a reason for the "low" tolerance angle between wall velocity and wall direction.
Running the case with a rotating wall boundary condition while some parts of the wall are not tangential to the velocity components makes no sense.
The walls would have to move through the fluid domain, which they can't unless you use a moving mesh or some kind of rotor-stator setup.

BTW: there are many more parts of the suface which point into the tangential direction of the rotation you are trying to apply.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2012, 12:34
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 5
tango711 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
There is a reason for the "low" tolerance angle between wall velocity and wall direction.
Running the case with a rotating wall boundary condition while some parts of the wall are not tangential to the velocity components makes no sense.
The walls would have to move through the fluid domain, which they can't unless you use a moving mesh or some kind of rotor-stator setup.

BTW: there are many more parts of the suface which point into the tangential direction of the rotation you are trying to apply.
Thank you Alex,

In that case, do you think that if I make that whole domain rotating, and apply a counter rotating wall BC on the outside wall, that this is solve my problem?

Would the fluid flow be sufficiently similar to what I was trying to do?

Thanks again,

Tango
tango711 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2012, 14:27
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,104
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
In general, rotating the part or the domain are not the same.
It is impossible for me to judge whether the error is neglectable in your case.
I don't know enough about your setup and about rotating domains.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Natural convection in a closed domain STILL NEEDING help! Yr0gErG FLUENT 3 June 12, 2013 02:12
Applying Rotational Boundary Condition on Surface with Radial Wall tango711 CFX 13 July 18, 2012 14:02
Influece of wall velocity in the main flow marvin CFX 0 March 22, 2008 03:05
Simple Wall Boundary Conditions for Turb. Flow Greg Perkins Main CFD Forum 4 May 28, 2002 23:10
procedure to apply wall function sigit Main CFD Forum 6 June 12, 2001 00:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:36.