CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Time scale factor and physical timescale

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 8, 2012, 14:49
Default Time scale factor and physical timescale
  #1
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 300
Rep Power: 8
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
Could some one please let me know when to use the time scale factor of the auto timescale and when to change to physical timescale when the intention is to accelerate convergence by changing the time scale in CFX.
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2012, 19:48
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,859
Rep Power: 78
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Starting a simulation with auto time scale is usually OK. If you have convergence problems then make it smaller. Once the simulation is converging nicely then you can start increasing the time scale size to accelerate convergence.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 9, 2012, 04:29
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 4
bratzinger is on a distinguished road
or if u want to calculate it by yourself and u know the massflow and the typical cross-section area:
v(_char)=m_dot/(rho*A) -> t_char=length/v(_char)
u should get roughly the same (depending of the complexity of your geometrie the same value or at least ~ the same power of tchar)

with heat flux i often use e.g. 100s for phys. timescale - a time where the casing in my project should easily got the right temperatures ... in my steady state simulation (hope i understood that right that u can avoid transient influence through initial conditions in that domain if u set it suficiantly high?)

for the energy equation i often use large timescale factors(100, 500 or more) to accelerate convergence

Last edited by bratzinger; August 9, 2012 at 04:53.
bratzinger is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 22, 2012, 05:00
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 300
Rep Power: 8
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
Hi Glenn,

So if there is an auto time scale of 9 [s] and if I wanted it to be 0.9 [s] then does it make the same sense with the two approaches viz..,:

1. Setting the Time Scale Factor to 0.1 in the auto time scale.

2. Directly switching over to physical time scale and setting it to 0.9 [s]
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 22, 2012, 07:46
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,859
Rep Power: 78
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Both approaches are equivalent, they both set the solver to 0.9s. Do which ever is easiest for you.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35.