CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Question about coarsening the mesh to improve convergence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 10, 2012, 16:43
Question Question about coarsening the mesh to improve convergence
  #1
Senior Member
 
Anna Tian's Avatar
 
Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 472
Rep Power: 6
Anna Tian is on a distinguished road
Hi

I have vortex at some domains of my case. The FAQ suggests me to coarsen the mesh to improve the convergence. But that will decrease the accuracy. Is there any other ways to improve the convergence for this problem?
__________________
Best regards,
Meimei
Anna Tian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2012, 23:56
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Sainath
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 5
sainath.s@tdps.co.in is on a distinguished road
Only way you are going to capture vortices is through a fine mesh. Let me know what you are trying to model. Let me see if i can helpyou out
sainath.s@tdps.co.in is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2012, 05:40
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Anna Tian's Avatar
 
Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 472
Rep Power: 6
Anna Tian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by sainath.s@tdps.co.in View Post
Only way you are going to capture vortices is through a fine mesh. Let me know what you are trying to model. Let me see if i can helpyou out
Sorry, I'm not allowed to reveal that geometry. But do you mean that I can solve this problem by refining the mesh and match the mesh with the fluid behavior?
__________________
Best regards,
Meimei
Anna Tian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2012, 06:31
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Sainath
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 5
sainath.s@tdps.co.in is on a distinguished road
If you are planning to capture vortex formation and shedding you need to have a fine mesh such that it is captured. Very small eddies can also be captured using sub grid scale type of modeling.

But there are constraints like you need to have a good computational power. Using a LES or DES model is going to be computational intensive. So plan accordingly. O

If your aim is something else and vortices are formed just as the side effects of the problem then you can refine the mesh only in those are and can go in with a coarse mesh in the other areas.

I really do not know what your problem is, these are just requirements for capturing vortices.

Also go through the FAQ's, you may find some more tips to find effective convergence and accuracy.
sainath.s@tdps.co.in is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2012, 01:56
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 5
mat_cfd is on a distinguished road
It isnt always required for your residual to converge. If capturing vortex is not important then you can use monitor plots like mass flow, pressure to see if you have achieved fair enough convergence.
mat_cfd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2012, 08:03
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
The FAQ suggests me to coarsen the mesh to improve the convergence.
Which FAQ suggests that? This is only one of many suggestions in the FAQ - why do you say a coarser mesh is required in your case?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2012, 13:25
Question
  #7
Senior Member
 
Anna Tian's Avatar
 
Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 472
Rep Power: 6
Anna Tian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mat_cfd View Post
It isnt always required for your residual to converge. If capturing vortex is not important then you can use monitor plots like mass flow, pressure to see if you have achieved fair enough convergence.
I only care about the pressure drop. I don't care about the vortex at all. But I'm wondering if I don't solve the vortex, could the simulation pressure drop results still be accurate?
__________________
Best regards,
Meimei
Anna Tian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2012, 13:30
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Anna Tian's Avatar
 
Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 472
Rep Power: 6
Anna Tian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Which FAQ suggests that? This is only one of many suggestions in the FAQ - why do you say a coarser mesh is required in your case?
'
A physical instability, such as vortex shedding - the fix here is to use a larger timescale, a coarser mesh in the vortex shedding region, decrease the blend factor (if using hybrid differencing) or use a lower order turbulence model. The first option is preferred as the latter options can have accuracy implications.
'

It's from the FAQ of this forum.
__________________
Best regards,
Meimei
Anna Tian is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 12, 2012, 21:57
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I wrote the FAQ so if it is unclear I would like to improve it.

My intention was to say that if the vortex is not important in the flow for the results you are interested in then you can dissipate out the vortex by coarsening that region of the mesh. But if this is an important part of the flow - for instance it adds resistance which significantly contributes to the over pressure drop in the simulation - then it is important and you should not get rid of it.

So before you coarsen that region of mesh you have to make sure that it is not significantly contributing to important flow features. Only if it is not then you can coarsen the mesh in that area to get rid of it.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2012, 14:53
Default
  #10
Member
 
Felggv's Avatar
 
Felipe Gobbi
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 5
Felggv is on a distinguished road
What is your problem message? What error does CFX-Solver point?
Felggv is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] surface mesh merging problem everest ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 39 June 5, 2013 19:02
[ICEM] issue occur after extrude 2D airfoil mesh and convergence problem in CFX shiyun ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 May 9, 2012 19:55
A question on adaptive remeshing or mesh deformation for handling object motions daveatstyacht OpenFOAM 10 November 13, 2010 10:29
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 20:43
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49.