CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

FSI: Convergence issue for a simple cylinder on top of a latex membrane

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 24, 2012, 17:23
Default FSI: Convergence issue for a simple cylinder on top of a latex membrane
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
Geraud is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I'm currently working on slosh damping in a cylindrical tank. I try to set a two-ways FSI model to study the impact of a vibrating latex membrane located on the bottom of the tank on free-surface waves.

To start progressively, I am trying to run a simulation without any forced motion for the membrane. I want to check the deformation of this 1mm thick membrane due to the water weight.

The pressure profile monitored is more than strange and the simulation crashed after 50 iterations with "Overflow". So I guess it's a convergence problem.

[PICTURE 1]

I was thinking the problem comes from the first timestep where the solver evaluate the pressure at 12bar (it should be around 1atm).

On the first loop of my simulation I get some 'F' for the linear solution. So I tried to focus on this first loop and try to minimize the linear solution residuals.
I changed the global number of cells of my mesh from 50.000 to 1.000.000 elements. For each mesh, I change the timestep between 1e-3s and 1e-7s.
-> I obtain a minimum for the linear solution residual around: Timestep=1e-5s and Number of Elements=200000 cells. But those residuals for momentum equations are still in 1e+1.

The plot of the monitored absolute pressure is different but don't match with expectations.

[PICTURE 2]

Am I doing all wrong? Any ideas or methods to make this simulation converge? Is it possible that a simulation cannot converge regardless of the mesh size and the timestep? I'm new in CFD and are learning on the job so I may be doing stupid things!

(I already start reading the Roache's book on CFD to learn more about "sensitivity analysis" but if there is any other reference that could help, let me know).

Thank you,
Geraud.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Picture1.jpg (46.3 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg Picture2.jpg (21.7 KB, 7 views)
Geraud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2012, 06:21
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,646
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
If you define a motion (ie no FSI) does it converge?

You will be able to get this simulation to work, but you should get individual bits of it working before you combine it all together. For instance, do a transient simulation first with no FSI and mesh motion, then add mesh motion with a prescribed motion (no FSI), then add the FSI.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2012, 11:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 5
Geraud is on a distinguished road
Thanks for answering,

Actually, I already ran a CFD analysis without FSI.

In this analysis, I use mesh motion to shake the tank and create free-surface waves: I get pretty good results, moreover, that converges easily for a very large range of timestep and mesh size. It's why I am really surprised about the instability of the FSI simulation.

At the beginning, I was worried about the membrane which is really fine and flexible but with a timestep smaller than 1e-4s, the structural part converges in one or two iterations without any problem. The fluid part, however, is getting me a very hard time, what is strange because the geometry is so simple.

Geraud.
Geraud is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 23, 2014, 18:02
Default
  #4
Azy
New Member
 
Azadeh Saeedi
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 23
Rep Power: 3
Azy is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am facing the same problem, I went through all the method that comes to my mind. Could you tell me whether you fixed your problem or not? and how?

Thanks

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geraud View Post
Thanks for answering,

Actually, I already ran a CFD analysis without FSI.

In this analysis, I use mesh motion to shake the tank and create free-surface waves: I get pretty good results, moreover, that converges easily for a very large range of timestep and mesh size. It's why I am really surprised about the instability of the FSI simulation.

At the beginning, I was worried about the membrane which is really fine and flexible but with a timestep smaller than 1e-4s, the structural part converges in one or two iterations without any problem. The fluid part, however, is getting me a very hard time, what is strange because the geometry is so simple.

Geraud.
Azy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Continuity convergence issue on a 3d wing Nick R FLUENT 18 February 4, 2015 12:21
[ICEM] issue occur after extrude 2D airfoil mesh and convergence problem in CFX shiyun ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 May 9, 2012 19:55
Convergence in Nat conv problem - simple geometry gradstudent2430 FLUENT 1 April 19, 2012 05:23
Specifying boundary faces failes in blockMesh blaise OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 0 May 10, 2010 03:56
SIMPLE for variable viscosity, poor convergence ? Anthony Ilaner Main CFD Forum 15 July 13, 2000 08:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:58.