CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Axial pump modelling problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 20, 2012, 06:19
Question Axial pump modelling problem
  #1
m4D
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
m4D is on a distinguished road
Hello.

I'm trying to simulate flow through an axial pump. The pump itself is an archimeds screw inside a pipe with a small radial gap. Model consists of three domains:
1) inflow part - is a stationary cylinder, from which i cut out front rotor bearing stands; a BC condition of total pressure = 0 (1atm, whatever) is set on it's front surface (let's call it A);
2) rotor - is a rotating cylinder (5000-15000rpm), from which i've cut out the impeller (2-blade archimeds screw);
3) outflow part - is a stationary cylinder, from which i cut out back rotor bearing stands and flow straightener; a BC condition of mass flow is set on it's back surface (let's call it B).
These 3 domains are connected together by 2 identical interfaces on touching surfaces: frozen rotor with auto pitch change (also tried stage with val = 1). Further explanations are in the attachment.

The problem is: the difference of pressures (n.m. which, total ones or not), i.e. a pressure rise, is always around some specific number, no matter which geometry of blades there's in flow straightener. The rotational energy of flow is converted in transitional energy, so the straightener must cause pressure raise, but i don't see it. BTW, if i remove the straightener completely, pressure rise is still practically the same, around 1-3%. Also, this particular pressure rise is far-far (~50%) away from the practically measured values. So, what's wrong with this simulation?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 11.jpg (53.8 KB, 22 views)
m4D is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 20, 2012, 07:25
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Rep Power: 74
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Sounds like an FAQ to me: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 20, 2012, 07:39
Default
  #3
m4D
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 3
m4D is on a distinguished road
But the results are not inaccurate, they are independent of straightener geometry. And that made me think, that the problem was setup incorrectly.
m4D is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Axial compressor bleed modelling Kishore Main CFD Forum 1 May 28, 2014 20:00
Urgent problem! Appreciate all you help!! 3D Centrifugal Pump set up problems! RR2 FLUENT 5 April 13, 2012 08:17
Low temperatures modelling heat pump with source terms stahl FLUENT 0 November 26, 2010 16:43
jet pump modelling mathews FLUENT 0 January 31, 2007 05:29
Heat Exchanger modelling problem lmitsc FLUENT 1 October 16, 2006 06:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:36.