CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Simulation of cavitation flow:problem of heat transfer

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 4, 2012, 01:46
Default Simulation of cavitation flow:problem of heat transfer
  #1
New Member
 
Lee
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4
kiwishall is on a distinguished road
While I solve the cavitation flow of LNG with k-omiga turbulence model, the RMS of H-Energy in the result kept being 1.0e+01 after only five steps(the curve of heat transfer is obviously wrong),and the rate of convergence were both zero.The details were as follows:
OUTER LOOP ITERATION = 5 CPU SECONDS = 2.227E+03
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom-Bulk | 0.97 | 1.4E-04 | 1.3E-02 | 1.2E-01 ok|
| V-Mom-Bulk | 0.96 | 1.3E-04 | 1.9E-02 | 1.1E-01 ok|
| W-Mom-Bulk | 0.97 | 1.9E-04 | 2.7E-02 | 1.5E-01 ok|
| P-Vol | 0.87 | 1.2E-05 | 7.4E-04 | 5.2 9.1E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| Mass-LNG | 0.93 | 2.5E-04 | 6.8E-02 | 6.1 2.2E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy-LNG |99.99 | NaN | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 OK |
| H-Energy-lngs |99.99 | NaN | 0.0E+00 | 5.9 0.0E+00 OK |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE-Bulk | 0.96 | 2.8E-04 | 4.4E-02 | 6.0 3.1E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq-Bulk | 0.95 | 1.2E-04 | 4.1E-02 | 7.7 1.9E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------
OUTER LOOP ITERATION = 6 CPU SECONDS = 2.735E+03
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Equation | Rate | RMS Res | Max Res | Linear Solution |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| U-Mom-Bulk | 1.22 | 1.7E-04 | 1.4E-02 | 2.8E-01 ok|
| V-Mom-Bulk | 1.24 | 1.7E-04 | 2.1E-02 | 2.8E-01 ok|
| W-Mom-Bulk | 0.97 | 1.9E-04 | 2.4E-02 | 1.1E+00 ok|
| P-Vol | 8.43 | 1.0E-04 | 3.8E-03 | 5.2 9.6E-02 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ****** Notice ****** |
| A wall has been placed at portion(s) of an OUTLET |
| boundary condition (at 0.3% of the faces, 0.6% of the area) |
| to prevent fluid from flowing into the domain. |
| The boundary condition name is: Blade Outlet. |
| The fluid name is: LNG. |
| If this situation persists, consider switching |
| to an Opening type boundary condition instead. |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Mass-LNG | 8.05 | 2.0E-03 | 2.6E-01 | 6.1 5.1E-03 OK|
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| H-Energy-LNG | 0.00 | NaN | 0.0E+00 | 0.0E+00 OK |
| H-Energy-lngs | 0.00 | NaN | 0.0E+00 | 5.9 0.0E+00 OK |
+----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+
| K-TurbKE-Bulk | 1.15 | 3.3E-04 | 4.5E-02 | 6.0 4.6E-02 OK|
| O-TurbFreq-Bulk | 2.35 | 2.8E-04 | 7.3E-02 | 7.7 2.9E-02 OK|
kiwishall is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 4, 2012, 07:42
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,656
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
This looks like a complex model with cavitation, heat transfer and multiple phases. Have you started with a simple model and introduced the physics one bit at a time?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2012, 00:45
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Lee
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4
kiwishall is on a distinguished road
In fact,I have solved many cases about cavitation at different conditions. Sometimes the result I got looks very well.But for the case with different geometrics (nozzle angle),it won't work.Maybe if I change the reference state of the materials I used,it will work and I can get a result that looks reasonable .But this strategy doesn't fit any case .Do youknow the reason ? Will the reference point affect so much ? How could I avoid this wrong results with what proper settings?
kiwishall is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2012, 06:17
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,656
Rep Power: 84
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Do you think explaining what you are modelling might help? And while you are at it maybe what is different about this one compared to the ones which worked well? I think that might help
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2012, 08:44
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Lee
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4
kiwishall is on a distinguished road
I have compared the result with those worked well .The unique difference is that I set the simulation with different reference point .If with a actual reference point , ref-enthalpy and ref-entropy ,only some cases could work well .If with automatic ref-point ,there will be more cases that will work will .If with none, the effect will get better . However there are still some cases that can't work will. That is the problem I want to know.In different cases ,everything is same except that the geometric has different nozzle angle. Thank you for your help!
kiwishall is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heat transfer coefficient - what is waht Stan FLUENT 20 March 11, 2014 11:42
Heat Transfer boundary conditions for engine coolant flow simulation rajuks Main CFD Forum 0 February 15, 2010 10:04
Heat transfer in an unsteady-state simulation Raed141 FLUENT 11 August 7, 2009 17:17
Cavitation with heat transfer Rocketman FLUENT 0 May 15, 2009 22:22
Which Heat transfer coeffcient to use? tengra FLUENT 1 May 1, 2009 13:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:22.