CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX Boundary conditions

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 23, 2012, 06:32
Default CFX Boundary conditions
  #1
Member
 
Vit Houst
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
vitulaaak is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I am modeling compressor in CFX.To prevent from switching boundary conditions, i tried to use opening on the outlet with pressure loss ( i would use outlet, but there is no such possibility to add pressure loss to this type of boundary).

when I use this approach, it sometime fall on overflow. To prevent from doing this I would like to do either:

1. specify different initialization file than current in workbench - I dont know how
2. specify a linear function of pressure loss vs. number of iterations

Could you please let me know, how it can be done.

V.
vitulaaak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2012, 08:23
Default
  #2
Member
 
Vit Houst
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
vitulaaak is on a distinguished road
I would add one point.

I know, how to initialize from initial conditions and not from current solution. Is there a way to initialize from last design point? This would probably be the preffered option.
vitulaaak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2012, 15:50
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Chris DeGroot
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 387
Rep Power: 6
cdegroot is on a distinguished road
You can initialize from any .res file, so it shouldn't be a problem to use the "last design point" as you put it. Do this in Solver Manager when you set up the case.

With regards to having a pressure loss that is a function of the iteration number, use a CEL expression.
cdegroot is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 24, 2012, 08:53
Default
  #4
Member
 
Vit Houst
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
vitulaaak is on a distinguished road
Hi,

that was exactly what I was looking for, but when you check the options that ansys offers you in the expressions, iteration number is not there. Anyway I found it in the help, so now it seems to work fine.
vitulaaak is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 25, 2012, 12:13
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Bruno
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brazil
Posts: 236
Rep Power: 12
brunoc is on a distinguished road
Why do you need to specify a pressure loss at the outlet? Could you explain us what is it you're modelling at the outlet?
brunoc is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 26, 2012, 06:20
Default
  #6
Member
 
Vit Houst
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
vitulaaak is on a distinguished road
Hello,the reason is following:
You can either specify mass flow or static pressure at the outlet. These conditions are not always met and you can get simulation problem...by specifying a pressure loss further downstream the compressor you basicaly try to simulate the reality. When you measure compressor performance you throttle the exit to get to different operating conditions. The other possibility would be to specify a variable porosity at the outlet to create again a pressure loss. This solution should be self sustainable.you should not need to swit h between different boundary conditions.
vitulaaak is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wind turbine simulation Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 17:44
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
Help with boundary conditions Dan CFX 0 April 3, 2006 11:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:08.