CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Is wall ajacent temperature equal to conservative temperature of the wall?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 27, 2012, 23:43
Default Is wall ajacent temperature equal to conservative temperature of the wall?
  #1
New Member
 
Shen Ying
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 5
shenying0710 is on a distinguished road
hello, my friends!
CFX manual says “Wall Adjacent Temperature, is the average temperature in the element adjacent to the wall. ” From this sentences, it seems that Wall Adjacent Temperature is just conservative temperature of the wall.
But in all my cases, I found that on adiabat wall, Wall Adjacent Temperature is equal to hybrid temperature of the wall, not conservative temperature! And on non-adiabatic wall, Wall Adjacent Temperature is neither equal to hybrid temperature nor conservative temperature of the wall!
Would you answer my confusion?
Thank you in advance!
Shenying

Last edited by shenying0710; December 28, 2012 at 02:32.
shenying0710 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 28, 2012, 05:25
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,803
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
No, the wall temperature is the temperature in the wall boundary face of the element, wall adjacent temperature is the conservative temperature of the element. The centroid of the element is off the wall, so it is representative of the flow near the wall.... hence the name.

Are you using wall functions? Or a laminar flow?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2012, 01:07
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Shen Ying
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 5
shenying0710 is on a distinguished road
Thanks, Glenn, you give good interpretation of the difference between hybrid temperature and conservative temperature of the wall. But my question is "Is Wall Ajacent Temperature the same as conservative temperature of the wall?", and you said yes, "Wall Adjacent Temperature is the conservative temperature of the element". But I found that on adiabat wall, Wall Adjacent Temperature is equal to hybrid temperature of the wall, not conservative temperature. And on non-adiabatic wall, Wall Adjacent Temperature is neither equal to hybrid temperature nor conservative temperature of the wall.
I'm really very confused about the three variables.

Last edited by shenying0710; December 29, 2012 at 01:27.
shenying0710 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2012, 01:14
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Shen Ying
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 5
shenying0710 is on a distinguished road
I used wall functions for turbulent flow. I guess what you will say may be like this page: http://www.eureka.im/3679.html . That's really my another question.
It says "For turbulent flow, Tnw is the conservative temperature for the wall node. This is what is used to close the wall heat flux when using turbulent wall functions. For laminar flow, Tnw is taken from averaging the vertex temperatures in the element adjacent to the wall."
I'm sorry that I can't understand. What's the difference between "conservative temperature for the wall node" and "averaging the vertex temperatures in the element adjacent to the wall" ? I think they are the same
shenying0710 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 29, 2012, 05:50
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,803
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I do not know off the top of my head what wall functions do to the parameters you are looking at. Laminar flows use simple wall boundaries which should behave as expected in the issues you are looking at, but wall functions are deliberate distortions of this to recreate the turbulent boundary layer.

Can you run a sample flow with laminar flow? Hopefully that should behave as you expect.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2012, 13:05
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Shen Ying
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 5
shenying0710 is on a distinguished road
I tried sample flow with laminar flow, and you guess what happened. All the three variables, hybrid temperature of the wall, conservative temperature of the wall and Wall Adjacent Temperature, are equal to each other!
Wow, now I'm lost in the confusion deeply, ha-ha.
shenying0710 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 30, 2012, 16:12
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,803
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Wall thermal wall boundary condition did you apply to the laminar flow model?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2013, 01:14
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Shen Ying
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 5
shenying0710 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
Wall thermal wall boundary condition did you apply to the laminar flow model?
I applied adiabatic condition to all the walls.
Anyhow, Ill try to summarize what I get during these days:
(1) for laminar flow, on adiabatic wall:
Wall Adjacent Temperature ≠ hybrid temperature ,
hybrid temperature= conservative temperature ,
The denser the mesh near the wall is, the closer Wall Adjacent Temperature is to hybrid temperature and conservative temperature.
(2) for turbulent flow, on adiabatic wall:
Wall Adjacent Temperature = hybrid temperature ,
hybrid temperature ≠ conservative temperature ,
The denser the mesh near the wall is, the closer hybrid temperature is to conservative temperature.
(3) for turbulent flow, on non-adiabatic wall:
Wall Adjacent Temperature ≠ hybrid temperature ,
Wall Adjacent Temperature ≠ conservative temperature ,
hybrid temperature ≠ conservative temperature .
shenying0710 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2013, 05:03
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,803
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
For laminar flow and adiabatic wall has zero temperature gradient, so of course all the temperatures will be the same. This is as expected. Also everything getting closer together with smaller mesh is to be expected.

I cannot explain the differences between the temperatures you are getting for the different combinations.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
wall adjacent temperature

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with zeroGradient wall BC for temperature - Total temperature loss cboss OpenFOAM 10 March 5, 2015 07:57
Radiation interface hinca CFX 15 January 26, 2014 18:11
Shadow Wall and temperature norger FLUENT 5 January 17, 2013 22:29
Wall temperature define in fluent zdz198728 Main CFD Forum 3 November 19, 2009 01:37
udf variable for wall temperature Kiran FLUENT 0 July 31, 2008 08:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:20.