CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

axis-symmetric symmetry and radiation models

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 8, 2013, 22:56
Default axis-symmetric symmetry and radiation models
  #1
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 9
evcelica is on a distinguished road
I am performing a quasi-2D axis-symmetric model and would like to include radiation if possible. The model is an enclosed cylinder and I an modeling it as a 1 degree 2D wedge (but I have removed the central prism element and used a symmetry condition there as well to increase mesh quality) The sides of the enclosure are steel, and it is filled with a monatomic gas which is completely transparent to radiation. I thought Discrete transfer model would be my best option, but I read in the documentation it uses a number of rays at different angles (8 by default) to compute view factors to different elements. With the thin model I'm guessing pretty much all the rays will contact the symmetry boundaries before another surface. Can I control the angles of the rays somehow? How does the discrete transfer model treat symmetry conditions? Will the rays just reflect perfectly off the boundaries until they meet other walls? Or will they be lost? Is any other radiation model more appropriate? The documentation describes nothing about this radiation model and symmetry. I'm really hoping CFX didn't blow it with their 3D only code again.

Thanks in advance
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2013, 06:19
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,830
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The CFX documentation is a bit thin on describing the details of the various radiation modelling. But my understanding is the rays used to calculate view factors in the discrete transfer model reflect off symmetry planes, so you should be OK. SO I think the discrete transfer model is the best one to use for you.

But I would do a little benchmark model to check it is functioning properly - maybe a fixed temperature wall inside a 2D tube and check the incident radiation is the correct analytical result.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2013, 08:44
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Erik
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Earth (Land portion)
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 9
evcelica is on a distinguished road
Very good advice Glenn, I simple benchmark is defiantly a good idea, Thanks, I'll do that!
evcelica is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
View factor radiation model. Symmetry boundaries verification.. Dimoon OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 9 April 29, 2014 02:12
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 17:44
radiation and symmetry Mark FLUENT 2 November 4, 2004 14:50
Radiation and Symmetry Eric Main CFD Forum 3 June 3, 2004 07:30
Radiation and symmetry Eric FLUENT 2 May 31, 2004 11:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33.