CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CFX

fluidization in 90-degree bend

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 27, 2013, 15:04
Default fluidization in 90-degree bend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5
Benfa is on a distinguished road
I am trying to simulate the pneumatic transport of solids in 90-Degree pipe bend. The mass fraction of the solids is about 0.99 and the including air about 0.01. We are interested in the simulation of the sedimentation process in dependece of the bulk mass flow at the outlet. Because of the high volumetric fraction of the solid phase (0.63) we need to use a euler-euler description. to simulate the sedimentation we need to switch to the inhomogeneous model with the Gidaspow drag law. If we include gravity and especially the "kinetic model" for the dispersed phase we get high instability while solving. At the moment we are thinking about an alternative approach to modell the sedimentation process. Does anybody have an idea about an alternative?
Benfa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2013, 17:53
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 11,278
Rep Power: 88
ghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the roughghorrocks is a jewel in the rough
CFX has no built in sedimentation or scour model. So for very high particle loadings like this I suspect CFX is not going to be able to do it. CFX has a fluidised bed model which can deal with particle densities approaching this, but that never sedimentates or scours. It is designed for coal combustors and agitated sand beds and things like that.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2013, 14:49
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 5
Benfa is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your comments.
There are some papers where CFX or Fluent is sucessfully used for simulating pneumatic transport. Currently we developed the simulation step by step. We got results of an inhomogeneous Euler/Euler simulation using Gidaspow Drag law and no particle collison model. The result is a solid layer with volume fraction of 1 that moves on the bottom of the pipe while the air moves with highe velocity. Next step was to implement the complete kinetic theory. Even with 1Ás time steps the simulation crashes. So we switched off again and implemented the Gidaspow modell for solid pressure to limit the maximumung packing to 0.63. But even if we use the solid pressure model the volume fraction of the particle phase does not reach a maximum fraction of 0.63. Does anybody has an idea what could be the reason for that. Or does anybody have an idea about an more efficient approach as the kinetic theory to get the main flow behaviour?
Benfa is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Erosion in 90 degree elbow bend mark- FLUENT 1 December 4, 2012 11:45
180 Degree Bend Duct Flow in FLUENT John222 FLUENT 3 July 25, 2012 10:23
90 degree bend in ssiim hanieh Main CFD Forum 0 June 5, 2011 05:04
tow phase flow in 180 degree bend akbar FLUENT 0 January 28, 2004 16:52
Flow in 180 Degree Bend Abhijit Main CFD Forum 9 November 7, 2002 10:44

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:52.