CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Convergence with reduced under relaxation and time scale factors

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2013, 11:02
Default Convergence with reduced under relaxation and time scale factors
  #1
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 8
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
In a steady state simulation if a reduction of under relaxation factor (for continuity) and a reduction of time scale factor (auto time scale) gives convergence with the monitor points then -

Is it fine to relay on such convergence (or) is it always a must in general to
run a few more iterations by revoking the default under relaxation factor
and with a time scale factor = 1 ?

SST turbulence model is used
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 18:31
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,826
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
I have never had to use relaxation factors in CFX, so it is highly unlikely you need to use them. If you have convergence difficulties there are better approaches.

There is no need to run time scale factor=1 at the end. As long as you are using physical time stepping, any time step size is fine providing it converges.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 19, 2013, 21:57
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 8
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
Many thanks for the clarification Glenn.

Actually I'm using Fluent to solve this case and my question indeed takes fluent as the reference.

I thought of gaining also a general insight so I also posted the question on this forum.

The information you provided is of help because the application of time scale factor in fluent is similar to that of cfx.

Fluent is ofcourse more driven by under relaxation factors too.
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2013, 07:04
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,826
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
So would this post have been better placed on the Fluent forum?

For SIMPLE based solvers, like Fluent's default solver URF are important and it is normal to adjust them. Also I have no idea what Fluent's time scale factor =1 means.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hydrostatic Pressure and Gravity miliante OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 132 October 7, 2012 22:50
Purpose of relaxation factors Mohsin FLUENT 5 April 30, 2010 11:57
Relaxation and convergence sammi Phoenics 0 March 20, 2008 04:32
Relaxation factors Vidya Raja FLUENT 7 September 26, 2006 20:00
relaxation factors and time accuracy Mike Main CFD Forum 7 May 21, 2005 12:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32.