# Question about CFX pressure averaging in a surface

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 30, 2013, 07:38 Question about CFX pressure averaging in a surface #1 Senior Member     Meimei Wang Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 492 Rep Power: 7 Hi, If there is a strong vortex across a surface and we'd like to extract the averaging pressure and total pressure value of this surface, could CFX output the averaged value accurately for this case? If not, how to improve the accuracy? __________________ Best regards, Meimei

 April 30, 2013, 08:00 #2 Senior Member   OJ Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: United Kindom Posts: 475 Rep Power: 11 If your solution is mesh independent and converged, then it should. I don't still understand what doubt prompted you to ask your question. OJ

 April 30, 2013, 08:56 #3 Senior Member     Mr CFD Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Britain Posts: 290 Rep Power: 6 For your info: Be careful with averaging if your simulation is transient. You should only turn the transient statistics on (transient average, transient standard deviation etc) after the initial transient has diffused. I.e. let your monitor points of interest (such as temperature or velocity) settle before recording transient averaged results. If your simulation is steady state then ignore what I just said.

April 30, 2013, 10:33
#4
Senior Member

Meimei Wang
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 492
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by oj.bulmer If your solution is mesh independent and converged, then it should. I don't still understand what doubt prompted you to ask your question. OJ

Because if there is a vortex cross that surface, we will have large pressure or total pressure gradient on that surface. If we do averaging, we will need to approximate the value for the area between the cell centers. That could introduce averaging errors, right?

Even we have grids independence, but that error could still be not small, right?
__________________
Best regards,
Meimei

 May 1, 2013, 11:04 #5 Senior Member   OJ Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: United Kindom Posts: 475 Rep Power: 11 I see. If you have a look at the definition of area averaged values: It is evident that averaging will suffer if the value of Ai, ie facet value of a single cell, is unreasonably (too) large to represent a distinct value of over its area, especially at the regions of high gradients. I think smaller the cell size at these critical areas, better would be your averaged values. I would use adaptive meshing (based on gradients) If I were too concerned with region-averaged statistics, while obtaining the mesh independence. And this distribution can be further refined for more accuracy. OJ

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Jwolf CFX 1 December 14, 2012 08:31 murx CFX 4 October 9, 2012 06:50 EVBUCF OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 14 August 20, 2012 04:31 paka OpenFOAM 15 July 21, 2008 05:03 DS & HB Main CFD Forum 0 January 8, 2000 16:00

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:53.