CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Wall Shear Ansys CFX

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 29, 2013, 06:39
Default Wall Shear Ansys CFX
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
king lui is on a distinguished road
Hello CFX Users,

I am doing some isothermal simulation to investigate the pressure loss in a cooling device. I am using the SST turbulence model with automatic wall treatment. My problem is now that for smaller flow rates I got converged results, but as I am doing a paramtric study, I could not achieve convergence at higher flow rates. So I generated another grid and the solution converged. However, as I have some results from literature it could be seen that for the first grid the results are quite realistic whereas by the second one the pressure loss is overestimated. In theory the automatic wall treatment should be relatively mesh insensitive. But I am sure the difference comes from the wall treatment. Does anybody know how CFX does calculate the wall shear stress?
By the way, my y+ values are for both grids smaller than one.
king lui is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2013, 19:22
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,553
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Why do you say the difference is from the wall treatment? Is that a guess or do you have evidence?

I suspect your second mesh is coarser, at least in an area which matters. This will lead to easier convergence (as coarser grids are more dissipative and therefore easier to converge) but less accurate.

So I would look at the region which the second mesh coarsened and try to refien mesh there but improve mesh quality. That is you best bet to get convergence on a grid with adequate resolution to be accurate.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2013, 08:32
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
king lui is on a distinguished road
Hey Ghorrocks,

thanks for your reply.
You are right, my second mesh is coarser. Maybe I was too much focused on the first inflation layer in my post-processing. I observed that my wall shear stress and shear strain rate are much higher for the second grid with smaller first layer thickness. I thought this leads to the overestimation of the pressure loss. Probably my y+ in the second mesh is too small. Do you have any experience about too small y+ values?

For both grids the number of inflation layers is equal, however as the second one is more fine, probably I canīt capture the entire boundary layer inside the inflation layers. But does this lead to the far higher wall shear stress?

Thank you in advance
king lui is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2013, 09:44
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,553
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
Yes, you can have problems when y+ gets too small. Often it is because of numerical round off issues. Double precision can help here.

It can lead to the problems you are seeing, but I cannot guarantee that is the cause.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2013, 11:40
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
king lui is on a distinguished road
Alright, I did all simulations with double precision but I will have a look on that if this is the problem. Many thanks for your reply.
king lui is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 2, 2013, 19:59
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,553
Rep Power: 83
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
You can still have problems with round off with double precision numerics - it just requires an even finer mesh.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Automatic wall treatment in CFX Chander CFX 12 March 21, 2015 10:34
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
how to map resultd from cfx to ansys? ritesh CFX 2 June 1, 2011 07:52
Wall shear in CFX shahpar73 CFX 1 March 16, 2011 19:40
Wall Shear in User Fortran Allan CFX 0 March 26, 2008 06:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:42.