Fatal overflow in linear solver

dengemunzur · February 29, 2016, 11:29

Hi Glenn,

I used cylindrical coordinates just to define the flow direction. And I experienced that CFX does the transformation itself. Also, I tried cartesian coordinates and it did not coverge.

Thanks for your consideration

ghorrocks · February 29, 2016, 16:43

Run the simulation again, but this time include the equation residuals and produce an output file just before it crashes. Then have a look in the post processor for where the region of high residuals are - this might give you a clue for the next step.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why?	zaidun	CFX	7	August 11, 2016 05:59
time consuming of the linear solver	luckycfd	OpenFOAM Programming & Development	3	September 23, 2013 05:29
Use "bounded" in scheme or not to use?	immortality	OpenFOAM Pre-Processing	0	June 11, 2013 16:20
solution diverges when linear upwind interpolation scheme is used	subash	OpenFOAM	0	May 29, 2010 01:23

February 29, 2016, 11:29		#21
dengemunzur New Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 14	Hi Glenn, I used cylindrical coordinates just to define the flow direction. And I experienced that CFX does the transformation itself. Also, I tried cartesian coordinates and it did not coverge. Thanks for your consideration

February 29, 2016, 16:43		#22
ghorrocks Super Moderator Glenn Horrocks Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,703 Rep Power: 143	Run the simulation again, but this time include the equation residuals and produce an output file just before it crashes. Then have a look in the post processor for where the region of high residuals are - this might give you a clue for the next step.