CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Solid Temperature in Non Equilibrium Model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 5, 2013, 07:34
Default Solid Temperature in Non Equilibrium Model
  #1
Member
 
davide basso
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5
rolloblues is on a distinguished road
Hi all, I'm developing a model of a regenerative chamber for glass furnace.
I'm using a porous model for the refractory honeycomb structure responsible for the heat recovery.
I correctly defined the solid phase for the porous media.
I'm using a non equilibrium model for heat transfer inside the porous media and I'd like to assign a linear dependency for the solid temperature as a function of vertical coordinate.

In CFX-Pre 14 I figured out how to define a heat source for the solid phase but nothing about a temperature function. The only thing I can do is keep the solid phase as "isothermal" at a fixed temperature which clearly is useless for me.

Does anynone knows a workaround (maybe with UDF or something) to assign a temperature profile to the solid phase in the porous domain?

What is puzzling me is that you can actually do this in the initialization tab for the porous domain but of course it won't be a stable condition for the calculation.

Thanks in advance
rolloblues is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2013, 09:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 274
Rep Power: 9
Opaque is on a distinguished road
I am not certain what you are trying to achieve by using the porous media non-equilibrium model this way.

Imposing a fixed temperature profile in the solid material of the porous media, as well as the heat transfer coefficient is equivalent to introducing a energy source term in the fluid phase equal to +/- HTC * (Tsolid - Tfluid). The non-equilibrium approach will not add any benefit to your model if that is the what you are really trying to do.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2013, 11:52
Default
  #3
Member
 
davide basso
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5
rolloblues is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
I am not certain what you are trying to achieve by using the porous media non-equilibrium model this way.

Imposing a fixed temperature profile in the solid material of the porous media, as well as the heat transfer coefficient is equivalent to introducing a energy source term in the fluid phase equal to +/- HTC * (Tsolid - Tfluid). The non-equilibrium approach will not add any benefit to your model if that is the what you are really trying to do.
No I can't use a source term for this reson:
I have two fluids flowing through the porous domain.
Lets say Fluid1 initial temperature is 300K while Fluid2 is 800K.

If I define a heat source inside the porous domain (W/m^3) this is a fixed value for all fluids. Each fluid receive locally the same amount of heat.

This is incorrect because as the solid temperature is a fixed value (in the real world) Fluid1 should receive more heat from the solid phase than Fluid2 which is hotter.

(Tsolid-Tfluid) is different for each fluid but a simple heat source won't take it into account
rolloblues is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 5, 2013, 13:32
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 274
Rep Power: 9
Opaque is on a distinguished road
My advice is to check some of the tutorials, and the theory of how sources are setup in ANSYS CFX. For multiphase cases, you must also read about BULK SOURCES.

Based on your description of the problem so far, a sample CCL for a multi fluid domain source to be applied to all fluids in the domain

Code:
FLOW: Flow Analysis 1
DOMAIN: Domain 1
    SUBDOMAIN: MySource
      Coord Frame = Coord 0
      Location = MySourceMesh
      BULK SOURCES: 
        Option = Use Volume Fraction <<<<<< Account for the volume fraction of the fluid
        EQUATION SOURCE: energy
          Multiply by Porosity = On <<< Your choice based on what net effect you want
          Option = Source
          Source = htc * (Tsolid - Temperature) <<< Different values for each fluid since Temperature is taken for the fluid equation being solved.
          Source Coefficient = -htc <<< Linearization coefficient
        END
      END
    END
END
END
Hope the above helps,
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 6, 2013, 09:50
Default
  #5
Member
 
davide basso
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5
rolloblues is on a distinguished road
Very interesting...I didn't know that it's possible to use "temperature" in a CCL without specifyng the fluid (If more than one is present). I'll give it a try...

Thank you very much!
rolloblues is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2013, 04:49
Default
  #6
Member
 
davide basso
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5
rolloblues is on a distinguished road
I did exactly what you suggested me but didn't work.
(Tfluid1-Tfluid2) at the bottom of the chamber is 600C while at the top is 400C.
I expect to find a smaller gap (50 approx) at the top.

Any Ideas?
rolloblues is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2013, 09:29
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 274
Rep Power: 9
Opaque is on a distinguished road
Without having the case details (geometry, mesh and physics setup), it is very difficult to advice via the forum when it comes down to expected/unexpected results.

As you have probably already read in the forum, it is always good to start with a simplified version of the problem, and ramp up the complexity to get a better understanding of what may be introducing a problem.

Have you tried to modify the porous media tutorial (catalytic converter) ? Selecting the geometry of a tutorial, and making incremental changes to reproduce your problem allows others to pitch in since you only have to exchange the CCL setup.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2013, 09:46
Default
  #8
Member
 
davide basso
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 5
rolloblues is on a distinguished road
You're absolutely right but you see: I already succesfully set up the same model with just one fluid flowing through the porous domain. Problems arose when I added a second fluid. Form that moment I still haven't figure out how to deal properly with a multicomponent heat transfer in the porous media
rolloblues is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
cfx 14, heat transfer, non equilibrium, porous media, solid phase

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem in modified pisoFoam with temperature equation + thermophysical model Matt_B OpenFOAM Programming & Development 15 September 16, 2014 09:50
Two phase Eulerian model with variable solid density ziglat2004 FLUENT 0 September 16, 2011 18:06
why is solid temperature same as fluid temperature on flow simulation ? qihongming FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM 0 May 26, 2009 08:57
Decending Temperature to Solid Domain (CHT). sandeep_tu CFX 1 May 12, 2009 18:54
No results for solid domain Gary Holland CFX 10 March 13, 2009 04:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00.