CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Discretization Type of Periodic Interface

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 3, 2014, 15:20
Default Discretization Type of Periodic Interface
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13
newbie384 is on a distinguished road
I checked my output file and I realized that the discretization type of periodic interface is 1:1. However, one of the periodic interface has GGI discretization type even though the interface mode is set to rotational periodicity. (See attached picture)

Is there something wrong here? or it is just the result of some automatic procedures by CFX?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg periodic discretization type.jpg (68.4 KB, 17 views)
newbie384 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 16:19
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
If the mesh does not match perfectly (or at least to a pretty tight tolerance) then it cannot use 1:1 and rolls back to GGI. Even a single node misplaced can trigger this. Have a very close look at your mesh interfaces to find the unmatched node.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 16:29
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13
newbie384 is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your quick response. Some of the meshes were created in TurboGrid and some were created in ICEM CFD. There is usually no problem with the periodic interface for the meshes created by TurboGrid. However, I found that sometime there will be problem with periodic interface in CFX, for the mesh created by ICEM CFD, even though I have defined periodic vertices in ICEM CFD and everything looks perfect in ICEM CFD(I looked at periodic association for vertices and faces). Is there anyway to overcome this problem?
newbie384 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 16:40
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
As I said the problem is the mesh does not match exactly. So you have to match the meshes up and find which node does not align. Then you can move the node to where it is meant to be in ICEM.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2014, 22:56
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13
newbie384 is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your advise. I solved the problem by removing the periodic in ICEM CFD. It seems that there will be problem in CFX if we pre-defined periodic in ICEM CFD.
newbie384 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2014, 10:50
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Edmund Singer P.E.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 511
Rep Power: 20
singer1812 is on a distinguished road
You need to run the check mesh routine in ICEM. It is under the Edit Mesh tab, and will do a series of checks (this will identify problems that might occur down the line).

One of the checks is periodic. It will do through the nodes on the periodic surfaces and line them up if they are off.
singer1812 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[OpenFOAM.org] compile error in dynamicMesh and thermophysicalModels libraries NickG OpenFOAM Installation 3 December 30, 2019 00:21
LES supersonic free jet martyn88 OpenFOAM 22 April 17, 2015 06:00
multiphaseInterFoam: timestep error by simulating a co-extrusion nozzle Quatschinsky OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 27, 2014 05:08
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 07:00
singularity? mihaipruna OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 April 24, 2012 17:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:13.