CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

Separating Interfaces in CFX

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 5, 2014, 16:13
Default Separating Interfaces in CFX
  #1
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
akalopsis is on a distinguished road
In my problem, I have a solid (heat sink) sitting on top of another solid (housing) and I have enclosed them both in a fluid domain since I am running a conjugate heat transfer analysis.

My issue is that when I'm trying to define the interface between the two solids, I cannot simple select where they are in contact, but rather only the entire face. The top face of the housing is in contact partially with the heat sink and partially with the surrounding fluid, but I can't define both or the interfaces will overlap.

This may seem like a simple problem, but I'm having a difficult time finding a solution online and it's messing up my solution. Any ideas?

Thanks in advance
akalopsis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2014, 20:03
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
A boundary face cannot be shared between two interfaces. You are going to have to break the surface up.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2014, 21:22
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
akalopsis is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
A boundary face cannot be shared between two interfaces. You are going to have to break the surface up.
Thanks for the quick response Glenn. I kind of figured as much, so that's what I've been trying to figure out how to do (I'm new to CFD). At what stage in the pre-processing can this be done and how would I go about doing it?
akalopsis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2014, 21:55
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The best way is to go to the solid model and split the face. Then mesh with both faces given a different name, and then use the different faces in different interfaces in CFX-Pre.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 6, 2014, 12:56
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
akalopsis is on a distinguished road
Perfect. I went back into SolidWorks (where I imported the geometry from), split the faces, and now they can be easily selected in CFX-Pre. The only other problem that I am still having with my model is related to the heat generation boundary condition. My goal is to impose a heat flux on two faces of the model and then see how this heat is dissipated through the solid and out into the fluid. When I run the solution with this imposed heat flux though, I get unrealistically high temperature values and I don't know why.

I'm confident that all the other boundary conditions are correct because when I run the same analysis with a fixed temperature instead of a heat flux, the results make sense. If the faces in question are in contact with the fluid, do I apply the heat flux to both the solid and fluid domains on that face? The heat flux is approximately 69 000 W/m^2, which I calculated from the area of the faces and the desired heat power (112.5 W per face).

Any help/guidance would be appreciated.
akalopsis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 9, 2014, 19:04
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Have you done the normal accuracy checks: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 10, 2014, 15:32
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 11
akalopsis is on a distinguished road
I just ended up using a fixed temperature, as it provided an adequate solution to my problem. That being said, I will take a look at that link in case I run into this problem in the future. Thanks again for your help.
akalopsis is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2016, 10:03
Default
  #8
Member
 
Marcel Jay
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Berlin
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 11
marcel_jay is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
The best way is to go to the solid model and split the face. Then mesh with both faces given a different name, and then use the different faces in different interfaces in CFX-Pre.
Dear Glenn, have you any idea if there a possibilty to do this automatically in Designmodeler or so?
I have bodies with faces that are in contact with two other solids and one fluid. I was using the Named Selections based on the Auto Connections, which makes it even worse as multiple faces are grouped.
As my model consists of ~80 interfaces and the maybe more than 200 faces which would needed to be split up, doing this manually can't be the solution.

Cheers
Marcel
marcel_jay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2016, 16:21
Default
  #9
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
Try the geometry and meshing forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ansys, cfx, conjugate heat transfer, interface


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX Treatment of Laminar and Turbulent Flows Jade M CFX 18 September 15, 2022 07:08
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 02:43
CFX pressure in Simulations problem nasdak CFX 1 April 14, 2010 13:22
Different flow pattern between OpenFOAM and CFX AirS OpenFOAM 0 January 12, 2010 07:08
CFX 10's solutions differ from CFX 5.7's Atit Koonsrisuk CFX 4 July 26, 2006 11:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56.