CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

CFX Convergence Problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By JuPa

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 17, 2007, 00:23
Default CFX Convergence Problem
  #1
Abdul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Pals,

I am simulating a duct in CFX. it is a inverted L shape duct. the inlet is located in the horizontal duct and the outlet is in the vertical duct. the vertical duct is bigger in size when compared to the horizontal. my problem is when the flow is coming out of the horizontal duct, circulations are formed at the two sides of the vertical duct as the velocity of my flow is bit higher (30m/s). so the solution is not converging it is keep on oscillating in 10e-3. i am using k-epsilon turbulence model and even i tried SST k-omega. can anyone help me to resolve this.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2007, 19:11
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #2
alex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hi abdul! Do u have a mesh adapted to your turbulence model? if i were you i will try to use an adaptated time step at first. Ansys published a very interesting doc concerning fluid flow separation. try to find it. by
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 17, 2007, 22:57
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #3
Omer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A few more details about how good your mesh is and about your boundary conditions would give more options.Try refining your mesh a little at the corner where the two ducts meet!
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2007, 02:39
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #4
Abdul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Omer for your reply. my mesh quality is around 0.35 and the min angle is about 41. i am using pressure inlet and massflow outlet boundary conditions.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2007, 07:06
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #5
Luke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Try using a very low physical timescale. If ur still having problems with convergence try a local timescale factor. But to make sure you have achieved convergence, swithch back to an auto timescale and if there is no change in your imbalances and mass flow then your case is converged. Your problem could be due to large difference in velocity timescales.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 18, 2007, 22:30
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #6
Omer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Pressure inlets are generally not a good idea. Is there a way you can have massflow or velocity inlet, and pressure outlet? It would really help you with the convergence.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2007, 00:21
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #7
Abdul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hai omer i tried that conditions too but the result is same. it is oscillating in 10-3.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 21, 2007, 23:31
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #8
Omer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Trying changing your autotimestep to a large physical timestep.

It might work...
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 25, 2007, 08:08
Default Re: CFX Convergence Problem
  #9
prabhu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Omer, Why do you think pressure inlet is not a good option compared to mass flow and velocity b.c.s.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 25, 2014, 02:51
Default
  #10
Member
 
Daniel Frederik
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 12
Daniel Frederik is on a distinguished road
Sometimes convergence is not achieved even thou the mesh quality is ok. That can be due to transient effects in the flow. Coarsening the mesh can help to make it converge because the sransient effects will not be detected by the mesh. The resukts obtained this way have to be treated with caution. In my opinion the best way would be to do a transient analysis in this case.
Daniel Frederik is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 2014, 08:42
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11
Meister is on a distinguished road
I would try different timesteps in a user-function and run every step for lets say 100it. Starting with the largest step (e.g. 0.1) to the smallest (e.g. 1e-6). You can easily see if there is a significant change in the convergency. There is also some features to force the simulation in a steady-state solution but probably it is best to do a transient simulation and do a average over time after.
Meister is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 2014, 08:48
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
JuPa's Avatar
 
Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 14
JuPa is on a distinguished road
The original post was made 7 years ago. I'm sure he's achieved a converged solution by now assuming he's not using a timestep of a picosecond.
JuPa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 30, 2014, 08:55
Default
  #13
New Member
 
Thomas
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 11
Meister is on a distinguished road
uhhh...so he should better change to the latest Version in CFX as well - they have better convergency
Meister is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Heat Transfer simulation: No convergence problem fiqs CFX 2 April 21, 2010 15:47
History Convergence: Graphical problem Bedotto Fidelity CFD 1 March 17, 2010 23:40
Urgent Problem with Hypermesh and CFX Luk CFX 5 March 14, 2008 04:59
convergence problem limseokmin FLUENT 3 November 14, 2004 12:43
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 04:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58.