CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

The mass flow rate changes TOO much!

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 30, 2015, 07:54
Default The mass flow rate changes TOO much!
  #1
Member
 
Stabum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 13
Stabum is on a distinguished road
Hello,
I'm trying to simulate a rotor/stator flow. I used the "stage" frame change option and the "High Resolution" Advection Scheme option.
The simulation ran fine with 1E-8 RMS residuals and 1E-6 MAX Residuals, but there's something that looks really strange to me: moving from the rotor to the stator the flow rate changes a lot (from 3000 kg/s to 3093 kg/s). Obviously the stator is set to "stationary", while the rotor is "rotating" with a given angular velocity.
Do you have any explanation about this behaviour?
Thanks so much!
Stabum is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2015, 08:42
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
Has the imbalance for the P-Mass equation (continuity equation) converged as well ? What is the mass imbalance reported in the output file, and in the Solver Manager ? Is it consistent with the values you see in CFD-Post ?
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2015, 09:15
Default
  #3
Member
 
Stabum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 13
Stabum is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
Has the imbalance for the P-Mass equation (continuity equation) converged as well ? What is the mass imbalance reported in the output file, and in the Solver Manager ? Is it consistent with the values you see in CFD-Post ?
Thanks for your answer!
The P mass converged at 1E-8 RMS and 2.8E-6 MAX

In the output file I read:
Domain Interface TR_TM Side 2 = -3.0114E+3 (inlet of the Rotor) and
Domain Interface TM_RA Side 2 = -3.0338E+3 (inlet of the stator)

What do you mean with "mass imbalance reported in the Solver Manager"? The output file collects all the infos reported in the Solver Manager during the calc process, doesn't it? (or maybe I've misunderstood your question)

Thanks again
Stabum is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2015, 09:51
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,804
Rep Power: 32
Opaque will become famous soon enough
We are talking about .7% mass imbalance here.

In the SolverManager, create a new Monitor Plot, select IMBALANCE, and plot the P-Mass equation. Is the imbalance still converging ? , i.e. it can be reduced further if given more iterations or it has long converged and remained fixed for many iterations.

If you increase the time step once converged this far, does the imbalance change.
Opaque is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 30, 2015, 10:12
Default
  #5
Member
 
Stabum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Italy
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 13
Stabum is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opaque View Post
We are talking about .7% mass imbalance here.

In the SolverManager, create a new Monitor Plot, select IMBALANCE, and plot the P-Mass equation. Is the imbalance still converging ? , i.e. it can be reduced further if given more iterations or it has long converged and remained fixed for many iterations.

If you increase the time step once converged this far, does the imbalance change.
Thanks, Opaque, for you advices.
In Solver Manager I've created a New Monitor, I've choosen "Plot Monitor" and then "Imbalance". Then I've selected P Mass Imbalance (%) Equation" for the Rotor Domain.
The graph has converged to 0 (8.8E-8 to be sharp).

I've repeated the same procedure with the P-mass Imbalance Equation for the stator domain and obtained the same thing...

Yes, it's true, it's a matter of .7%. The strange thing is that with other simulations (in which convergence was just 1E-5 RMS) i didn't see these imbalances.
Stabum is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX turbo - Mass flow rate Vashishth Patel CFX 7 April 3, 2014 20:33
Mass Flow rate in spray water modeling Behnam Ghadimi FLUENT 0 June 8, 2013 16:05
Mass Flow rate in spray water modeling Behnam Ghadimi Main CFD Forum 0 June 8, 2013 15:48
negative global mass flow rate Gimli FLUENT 0 April 21, 2006 07:17
mass flow rate error Masood FLUENT 0 May 22, 2005 00:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:28.