|
[Sponsors] |
July 27, 2013, 05:44 |
Flow in a rectangular duct
|
#1 |
Senior Member
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17 |
I have some questions on the simulation of flow in a rectangular duct.
Could some one please look into a short presentation attached here to better explain my questions and provide clarifications to the questions there.
__________________
Best regards, Santhosh. |
|
July 27, 2013, 07:07 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
You will get better comments if you post your questions directly in the forum rather than as attachments.
1) Yes, extend it as you describe. But put a monitor point at the real measurement start location to get your inlet pressure value. 2) I usually do this by sensitivity analysis. But there is stuff in textbooks and the literature about development length as a function of all sorts of things. 3) Yes, you can use the velocity profile funciton to do this. This would be an approach I would certainly consider for this case. |
|
July 27, 2013, 08:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Glenn,
Thank you very much for your clarifications , regarding the extraction of velocity profile from the simulation of an isolated extension, please suggest if I have to use a velocity inlet (for the extension) and a pressure outlet at atmospheric pressure (for the extension) (or) should I use a vice versa approach. Please have a look into the attached image if my question is not clear.
__________________
Best regards, Santhosh. |
|
July 28, 2013, 07:29 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
You should arrange the boundary conditions to match what you know about the flow. If the exit is known pressure, then put the pressure bounary there. If the inlet pressure is known put it there.
There is little difference in numerical stability in both cases, providing the inlet and out are far enough away from the action to not have separations in them. |
|
October 14, 2013, 06:20 |
Fully developed inlet conditions
|
#5 |
Member
DaveyBaby
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi!
It is possible to run a simulation separately with a periodic boundary condition, as opposed to an isolated extension. You could then not concern yourself with the length needed for full development as your development length could be effectively infinite. As you mentioned, you could then extract all three velocity and all three vorticity components within a cross-sectional plane and use these to define their respective components at the inlet, while still using the atmospheric pressure boundary condition at the outlet. This would mean that any secondary flows (such as the stream-wise vortices found in the corners) would already be present. You could run the fully developed solution just once, and use it to set the inlet velocity profile for multiple runs. I would be interested to know if you try this and it works, or if you foresee any problems with it that I haven't! Kind Regards |
|
October 14, 2013, 06:39 |
|
#6 |
Super Moderator
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143 |
This works and it is a very good approach to use if it is applicable.
|
|
October 14, 2013, 06:52 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 473
Rep Power: 20 |
Also, you may want to make sure you capture the secondary flows due to vortices at the four corners. In rectangular duct, typically, the general 2 equation models fail to capture these, because of their isotropic turbulence assumption. I have seen nonlinear EARSM k-eps and RSM work well with this, although the getting a convergence with both is difficult.
OJ |
|
December 11, 2015, 06:42 |
|
#8 |
New Member
wangzhijun
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi saisanthoshm88,
This is interesting, did you work out it ? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
periodic boundary condition for one face of a (3D) rectangular duct domain | Das | Main CFD Forum | 1 | April 5, 2013 07:39 |
Turbulent Flow in a Square Duct using LES | Hock Ming | FLUENT | 0 | February 7, 2009 20:25 |
Simulate 3D rectangular duct with Symmetry BC | giogio | FLUENT | 0 | January 19, 2008 07:55 |
in flow and out flow in a short duct | jane | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 27, 2004 23:08 |
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # | Axel Rohde | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 19, 2001 12:19 |