CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

fatal overflow in linear solver

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By -Maxim-
  • 1 Post By -Maxim-
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks
  • 1 Post By ghorrocks

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 15, 2016, 05:16
Default fatal overflow in linear solver
  #1
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I am simulating turbine. First, I ran with 448505 cells and results a.

lls, there is the following error, Why?

turbulence model is K-e scalable. Analysis type is steady.






Thanks for your help.

Last edited by aja1345; April 18, 2016 at 09:51.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 05:57
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12
-Maxim- is on a distinguished road
This is an FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...do_about_it.3F
aja1345 likes this.
-Maxim- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 07:30
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Thanks.

According the following text, What is the exact meaning of "time step"? Time step is about unsteady solution. right? or is time scale??

  • Does the model require small time steps to start? Some simulations require small time steps to start, but once going the time step can be increased.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 07:39
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Maxim
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 415
Rep Power: 12
-Maxim- is on a distinguished road
yes, in a steady-state simulation it's timescale. Are you using auto timescale? Try different factors. Like 0.1, 1, 10, 100.
I've never used k-e scalable. So I don't know if any restrictions apply with this model. Maybe worth to check. Why aren't you using SST? It's the standard model for CFX and F. Menter, inventor of this model, works with Ansys - so that model should work the best
aja1345 likes this.
-Maxim- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2016, 17:11
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Maxim- View Post
yes, in a steady-state simulation it's timescale. Are you using auto timescale? Try different factors. Like 0.1, 1, 10, 100.
I've never used k-e scalable. So I don't know if any restrictions apply with this model. Maybe worth to check. Why aren't you using SST? It's the standard model for CFX and F. Menter, inventor of this model, works with Ansys - so that model should work the best
Thanks.

According to your statement, I used auto timescale and I change value of factor and also i used physical timescale, but there is the Error!!! I think that mesh quality is good. But about initial condition, I set options according ANSYS CFX 15.0 Documentation. I have not enough other information about intial condition. i set this case as follows:


For example, I had changed value of physical timescale to 0.1, but there is error in outer loop 12 as follows:

About SSt model, I performed with sst, but again there is previous problem!


Thanks for your guidance.

Best.

Aja

Last edited by aja1345; April 18, 2016 at 09:52.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2016, 06:33
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
It is not an error, it is a warning. See this FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...f_an_OUTLET.22

Also - refining the mesh makes convergence harder, not easier. You should expect more problems getting convergence as you refine the mesh.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2016, 07:32
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Aja
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 496
Rep Power: 14
aja1345 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghorrocks View Post
It is not an error, it is a warning. See this FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...f_an_OUTLET.22

Also - refining the mesh makes convergence harder, not easier. You should expect more problems getting convergence as you refine the mesh.
Thanks.

But when this massage appears, solution diverges!!!

I read FAQ: http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys...do_about_it.3F

I have one question about above link:

Is opening type boundary condition can be placed from the beginning in outlet?

In CFX documentation and the tutorial examples,it is not explained about this warning messages completely!!

How do I solve this case??

I am grateful that guide me more.

Thanks.

Last edited by aja1345; April 16, 2016 at 14:20.
aja1345 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2016, 07:47
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,703
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
The best approach when you get the "a wall has been placed..." warning is to move the outlet further downstream so that the recirculation does not hit it and the flow is all in the forwards direction. If this is not possible then replace it with an opening. And in some cases you can just ignore it and continue anyway.

But if you are having stability issues then you should try to move the outlet further downstream to avoid the problem. Also have a look at mesh quality in general. Any improvements in mesh quality will have a major effect on convergence.
aja1345 likes this.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fatal overflow in linear solver error. Why? zaidun CFX 7 August 11, 2016 05:59
Fatal overflow in linear solver alinik CFX 21 February 29, 2016 16:43
fatal linear solver overflow h.mortezaee CFX 2 July 3, 2015 10:35
2D isothermal cylinder not converging UPengineer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 March 13, 2014 05:17
time consuming of the linear solver luckycfd OpenFOAM Programming & Development 3 September 23, 2013 05:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:24.