CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Modified turbulent viscosity

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 18, 2000, 03:54
Default Modified turbulent viscosity
  #1
Christoph Oehy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I'm working with horizontally stratified two-phase flows and I'm using the standard k-epsilon model. As I need to take into account the stratification, I'm trying to modify the turbulent viscosity depending on the local Richardson number as it was proposed by Rodi (1980). Has anyone already done this? Is the VIS(INODE,IPHASE) only the laminar, turbulent or the effective viscosity? (I thought in turbulence modelling it becomes the turbulent viscosity). Can I use a conventionally central differencing scheme to compute the local Richardson number? Thanks, Chris
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2000, 08:26
Default Re: Modified turbulent viscosity
  #2
Li Xinfeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think the vis(inode,iphase) is the laminar viscosity. and the turbulent viscosity is defined by this method. vist=Cmiu*desitiy*k*k/epsilon. I don't understand you second question well,why not be able to use the convertionally central differencing scheme? Hope I can give you some help. Best regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 20, 2000, 03:19
Default Re: Modified turbulent viscosity
  #3
Andreas Abdon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Christoph,

I suspect VIS(INODE,IPHASE) to be the effective viscosity but I suggest that you print out this variable for a turbulent run to make sure... Sometimes for high Re flows the laminar viscosity is neglected so that the effective viscosity is identical to the turbulent viscosity. I don't know if this is the case for the high Re k-eps in CFX.

Regards Andreas

ps. please let me know if VIS is not the effective viscosity!
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 23, 2000, 22:08
Default Re: Modified turbulent viscosity
  #4
Athar Zaidi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi!

In USRVIS, variable VISN(INODE,IPHASE) stores the effective viscosity in case of turbulent flows. VISN(INODE,IPHASE) = VISL+VIST ,where VISL is the molecular viscosity and VIST is the turbulent viscosity. CFX4.2 calculates VIST on fly and doesn`t stores it, however in solving the transport equations of k and epsilon you have the terms like (mu+mu_T/sigma), CFX actually subtracts VIST from VISN to get mu and since solver has already calculated VIST it divides this quantity by sigma to solve the transport equation. I have tried this and it works for Newtonian fluid flow , for non-Newtonian fluid flow where VISL is also a function of shear rates whole new strategy has to be adopted using user scalars for k and epsilon or omega ( depending which model you are using). We have successfully implemented this strategy for low-Reynolds-number k-w model for modeling non-Newtonian blood flows, both for steady state and transient flows. I hope this will help you . regards Athar
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 27, 2000, 22:06
Default Re: Modified turbulent viscosity
  #5
LI Xinfeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I ask the technical support.he told me the vis is efficient.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
reversed flow at pressure inlet and turbulent viscosity is limited.... cfdiscool FLUENT 10 June 10, 2015 06:15
Modified turbulent viscosity rayzcorp FLUENT 0 June 24, 2011 12:36
Turbulent viscosity and shear rate shib FLUENT 0 June 22, 2010 12:44
setting value of turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio in wind tunnel nuimlabib Main CFD Forum 0 August 4, 2009 00:05
Problem of Turbulent Viscosity Ratio Limited David Yang FLUENT 3 June 3, 2002 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:17.