CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 18, 2000, 04:59
Default CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #1
deasyh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Which one is better??? and why? whats the difference?
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2000, 06:04
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #2
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
4.3 is only for structured meshes and has a lot of models in it (allows for user coding). 5.3 is only for unstructured meshes and has a VERY limited number of physical models in it and does not allow for user coding (not even in version 5.4)

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2000, 08:36
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #3
deasyh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Could you please elaborate more on 'very limited number of physical models'? Thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2000, 08:50
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #4
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
not available in CFX 5.3: cavitation, mass transfer between phases, free surface flows, extended turbulence modelling (only basic models are available), general user coding (fortran routines), real gas modelling, moving grids etc.

Look at the CFX web site. I myself work witrh STAR-CD 3.1 and CFX 5.3

Major advantage of CFX 5 is the robust and fast coupled solver (they got it from tascflow but did not transfer the modelling yet available in tascflow)
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2000, 00:28
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #5
joecfd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also,

- Parallelisation in CFX-4.3 stinks. 5.3 and 5.4 are far superior, scalable to as many CPU's as you want as long as you increase the grid size.

- 5.3 and 5.4 can do structured meshes BTW. You can import them meshes from a number of third party grid generators, as well as CFX-4 and TASCflow.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2000, 09:41
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #6
stuart Orme
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, Like the other people have said the main differences between CFX4 and CFX5 are the structure and unstructured approaches to meshing. If you are looking to model a complex geometry, requiring little in the way of additional user added physics then CFX5 is the one for you. However if the model is relatively simple but you want to implament say your own turbulence model, then you would want to do this in CFX4. CFX are hoping to bring out next year CFX5 with user fortran, which will then allow much greater user interation with the code. Version 5 is the way forward, but its still got a little catching up to do when compared with 4
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2000, 22:31
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #7
joecfd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
5.3 is a 2 year old version of CFX-5. Quite a few more features have been added since then. One might also point out that CFX-5 can run on a structured mesh just as easily as an unstructured mesh if you use the mesh import features (CFX-4 meshes obviously being one of the choices). So, if your modelling requirements are within the realm of that which CFX-5 handles, CFX-5 is the better choice.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 5, 2000, 11:21
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #8
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Did you know that in the latest version of CFX 5.4 the ratio Cp/Cv is set to 1.4 whatever you do? They lost a lot when going from 4.3->5
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2000, 23:24
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #9
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your statement is not correct. You can change the ratio of specific heats using the expert parameter:

specific heat ratio = gamma

Gamma is only used when calculating the total pressure for an ideal gas.

Dan.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 15, 2000, 05:18
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #10
Bart Prast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you want to model real gas effects a constant gamma is of no use. The calculation for total pressure is wrong anyway (is calculated assuming a ideal/perfect gas)
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 16, 2000, 02:12
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #11
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yep. You are right. CFX-5 can properly deal with constant density or density defined by the ideal gas model. I don't belive that anywhere in the documentation it says that CFX-5 can model real gas effects.

Dan.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 23, 2001, 01:05
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #12
Monir Hossain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Sir,

I have found CFX 5.4 is very convelient to create Furnace Geometry. But the problem is CFX5.4 has no facility to simulate Coal Combustion.So, if I like to import CFX5.4 geometry file by CFX 4.3 for Combustion, is it possible and how?

Regards,

Monir
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 8, 2001, 10:32
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #13
Li Xinfeng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It's impossible now. Because the cfx4 is structure mesh and cfx5 is unstructure mesh.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 9, 2001, 21:37
Default Re: CFX 4.3 vs CFX 5.3
  #14
Monir Hossain
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your clarification. Regards,

Monir
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reaction region in CFX 4.3 windhair CFX 3 December 8, 2002 13:11
CFX 5.4 cannot restart with 5.3 format Bart Prast CFX 6 September 14, 2000 16:05
Use of 1 equation turbulence model in CFX 4.3 Niels Deen CFX 0 July 19, 2000 09:50
File export from CFX 5.3 Sinjae Hyun CFX 1 July 12, 2000 10:20
Suitability of OpenDX for viewing CFX 4.3 results Jonathan Wall CFX 3 April 4, 2000 09:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:12.