CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Higher order for phase volume fractions?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 5, 2000, 15:46
Default Higher order for phase volume fractions?
  #1
George Bergantz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am not a user of CFX products but am curious about the following:

Do the Eulerian-Eulerian multiphase packages in CFX offer higher order representations for the conservation equations for phase volume fractions? I ask because the numerical diffusion associated with this can degrade the usefulness of multiphase simulations, even if higher order formulations are used for the other conservation equations. This is a real issue for buoyancy dominated flows where small errors in phase volume fraction can cause problems.

Please advise, thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2000, 10:24
Default Re: Higher order for phase volume fractions?
  #2
jon Lewin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can use higher order schemes for VF and I would advise you do so.

I would advise using a bounded higher order scheme such a Van Leer, Super Bee, etc.

Are you running a turbulent case?
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2000, 12:55
Default Re: Higher order for phase volume fractions?
  #3
George Bergantz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi jon:

I have used higher order schemes in other commercial packages for the usual scalars- temp, etc., but to my knowledge no one has yet implemented them for the phase volume fractions. Does CFX allow for this for phase volume fractions?

In buoyancy dominated multiphase flow numerical diffusion of phase volume fraction is especially vexing as one gets potential energy leaking at certain scales, and if there is reaction that changes the density it makes matters worse. The tail ends up wagging the dog.

I work in that never-never land of Reynolds number from .1 to 10,000 and so usually below the mixing transition to fully developed turbulence.

I would appreciate hearing how other users address this issue. There is a paper (can't find full reference at the moment) by Malcolm Andrews from about 1995 that offers one approach to this problem. Will post that reference in due course.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High order finite volume schemes DoHander Main CFD Forum 5 January 19, 2010 01:59
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Higher Order FV Schemes for unstructured meshes Apurva Shukla Main CFD Forum 4 December 15, 2000 10:17
Gradient Estimation for Higher Order Schemes jianxia Main CFD Forum 0 June 6, 2000 19:40
Higher order FVM Sergey Smirnov Main CFD Forum 10 April 15, 2000 01:49


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38.