CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Indoor Air Quality

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 8, 2001, 22:08
Default Indoor Air Quality
  #1
Yiu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I try to analyse the age of air inside a room with mechanical ventilation using CFX5.4. This is my setting:

1.model a room with inflow duct and outflow duct. 2.use addition variable, say VAR 3.set the inital VAR as 0.01 kg/m^3. 4.set inlet BC with 0.0 kg/m^3. 5.run transient simulation. 6.Check the concentration of VAR in my result. --> it didn't converge.

Do anyone have idea or experience of analysing aga of air in a room? Can you give me some suggestion?

Regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2001, 02:07
Default Re: Indoor Air Quality
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Your question is important, but it is hard for us to answer your question directly. (2). The application of a commercial code(s) can be divided into two areas, one is using it to solve a similar problem, and the other is using it to solve a new problem. (3). My suggestion is: try to find an existing tutorial sample case first, and make sure that you can "repeat" the sample case and obtain the same result. If you can pass this stage, then try to relax (adjust) the geometry or boundary conditions one-at-a-time, to see whether the solution is stable. (4). By following this approach, you can "zoom in" your solution. (5). For example, you can make the room as the size of the inlet , and compute the flow through a simple duct. Once you have the flow through a duct, you can make the room larger than the inlet. It becomes flow through a sudden enlargement. In this way, you can find out whether it is the limitation of the code, or the hidden error of the modeling. (6). The fun part in CFD is the failure of the brain exercise.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 00:05
Default Re: Indoor Air Quality
  #3
Dan Williams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why would you need a transient calculation to converge? If you want to simulate the true transient development of the flow, with an accurate timestep, then it's only necessary to run enough coefficient loops within a timestep to achieve a suitable level of residual reduction.

If you are using a timestep which is on the order of the physical behaviour you want to resolve, then only 2 or 3 coefficient loops are necessary within a timestep.

Dan.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 20, 2001, 22:15
Default Re: Indoor Air Quality
  #4
Dewey Yin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why does your variable for age of fluid have dimensions of density?

The equation concerning age of fluid is that the substantial time derivative of the age of fluid is 1 (as you follow the fluid motion and move with it, its age increases at the same rate as actual time).

You may find it easier to work with the equation after multiplying both sides by density. There may be several ways to define the new variable in CFX-5.4 depending on what you do with density and what class of additional variable you choose, but it will always include a dimension of time. Be sure that your specify the source term (the 1 or the fluid density depending on your choice) correctly.

For the diffusivity of the age of fluid in turbulent flows, specify only the turbulent eddy viscosity (which is of convective origin) and omit the molecular viscosity.

The inlet boundary condition of age = 0 s is correct. The default initial age of 0 s for the fluid in the domain will be fine. All walls should be "adiabatic"!

And as Dan Williams pointed out, this should converge very quickly.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2001, 11:07
Default Re: Indoor Air Quality
  #5
Martin Kleimeyer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi there,

interesting problem. I have a similar problem with CFX5. I have an additional scalar source in a room and an outlet. But everything I tried with the k-epsilon model, it didn't converge. There are no problems with the differential stress model. Now I'm interested in the turbulence model you have used in your simulation.

Bye,

Martin
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Improve Mesh quality - airfoil simulation Lukas84 STAR-CCM+ 4 July 6, 2010 10:07
Question about Face quality arunjingade CD-adapco 1 June 25, 2010 16:48
[ICEM] Hex refinement negative quality afterwards Anorky ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 8 March 22, 2010 04:25
Different types of Mesh quality hagupta CFX 1 June 30, 2006 07:42
Gambit Mesh quality TOM FLUENT 1 February 8, 2002 08:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12.