|April 2, 2001, 13:04||
I'm humbly entering this interesting circle of CFX users with a simple question.
I'm using CFX5 with K-eps in order to study an industrial coupled heat transfer problem (solid conduction + fluid convection). Boundary conditions are quite trivial: one inlet, one outlet, two openings, two hot walls and some interface walls. On the other hand, the model is rotating and geometry is VERY complex: that's way I chose the unstructured CFX5 approach, rather than CFX4's structured.
I've been working for the last eight months with CFX5.4, obtaining good results in conforting accordance with experimental data (inside K-eps confidence levels obviously ;-) ).
The point is: all benchmarks I'm conducting using the NEW CFX5.4.1 solver turn out to be very disapponting.
The worst come from Eddy Viscosity and and Turb Kinetic Energy: in other words, all turbulence (which should have been re-written in its diffusive terms, I was told) seems to have come to a big nothing, i.e. severe under-estimation and false diffusion.
Does anyone know something about this?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Import iges file into CFX5.4.1 in Unix system||yli||CFX||2||May 5, 2003 08:49|
|CFX5.4.1||yli||CFX||1||May 1, 2003 08:46|
|CFX5.4.1 --> CFX5.5||Sara||CFX||4||July 10, 2002 04:50|
|turbulence modelling in cfx5.4.1||krishna||CFX||0||May 13, 2002 12:47|
|Error in CFX5.4.1||Sara||CFX||2||April 22, 2002 13:49|