CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

CFX vs. FLUENT

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 16, 2001, 11:52
Default CFX vs. FLUENT
  #1
Lu Wang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

can somebody give me a brief comparison of CFX vs. FLUENT in combustion applications? (our department's interests are furnaces, radiation chambers etc.)

General comments on work with CFX will be much appreciated.

Lu Wang
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 16, 2001, 19:46
Default Re: CFX vs. FLUENT
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). Why not create a small project first to define the problem your company is interested in, then give it to both vendors to work on it. (2). When it is done, you can make comparison on your own, based on your requirement. (3). Reacting flow application is not like flow over a 2-D wing or flow through a pipe. I would say that it is still a research subject. (4). You can focus on CFX in the first year and Fluent in the second year. This is also a good approach. I have seen companies with more than one code on their computer system. This might be another approach. Remember that the goal of a software vendor is to sell their codes, so, solving your problem is still your own business.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco Jade M Main CFD Forum 4 August 28, 2012 02:54
Import CFX def into Fluent eric_wang FLUENT 0 April 18, 2011 13:14
OpenFOAM vs. Fluent & CFX marco Main CFD Forum 81 March 31, 2009 14:22
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure Omer CFX 9 June 28, 2007 04:13
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? jobman Main CFD Forum 6 July 5, 2006 15:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58.