# different between the various averaging

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 June 8, 2001, 09:51 different between the various averaging #1 huwei Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, Is there anyone can tell me the difference between the mass averaging, area averaging, theta_averaing, I mean the physical meaning. I am runing a case of centrifugal pump, and want to get the velocity and pressure average value in some special regions, but I do not understand the physical meaning of these three averaging methods. thanks

 June 8, 2001, 13:52 Re: different between the various averaging #2 Jan Rusås Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Huewei, I will try to explain my answer by an example. consider this very simple case: 2 face's face 1 face 2 area A 1 2 massflow m 1 1 x variable 1 0.5 area average = (A1*x1+A2*x2)/(A1+A2)= (1*1+2*0.5)/(1+2)= 2/3 mass average = (m1*x1+m2*x2)/(m1+m2)= (1*1+1*0.5)/(1+1)= 3/4 When calculating a pressure difference (both static and dynamic) you must use the mass average - it comes from the energy equation. For averaging the velocity the area average should be ok. Regards Jan

 June 18, 2001, 23:41 Re: different between the various averaging #3 Robin Steed Guest   Posts: n/a A mass average is calculating by taking the mass-integral of the scalar and dividing by the total mass-flow. Area averaged quantities are calculated by taking the area-integral and dividing by the total area. Theta averaged quantities are taken by integrating over the entire angular extent and dividing by the total angle (typically used by averaging along lines of constant radii to estimating mixed-out quantities for a downstream component). Whether to use mass averaging or area averaging depends on how a quantity is conserved. i) If you are concerned with a conserved quantity, such as momentum or total pressure, a mass average is appropriate because it is the mass integrated quantity which is conserved. ii) If you are looking at static pressure, it is the area integral (force) which is conserved and thus the area average should be used. Robin

 February 22, 2015, 14:09 #4 New Member   a.farid Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 14 Rep Power: 5 Hello, I have a problem when calculating the mass average of the circumferential velocity component cu i found its value higher than the mass average of the absolute velocity c , how?!!!!!! Can any on help me to know the reason. Thanks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post eelcovv OpenFOAM Programming & Development 22 November 19, 2014 09:53 Connor STAR-CCM+ 1 April 5, 2011 04:52 cspectre CFX 2 December 6, 2009 06:30 iko FLUENT 3 July 3, 2008 05:55 fab Main CFD Forum 2 June 16, 2005 04:53

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25.