
[Sponsors] 
July 26, 2001, 10:57 
Model enqury

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I want to model a ventilated room (3m by 2m by 1.5m)with inlet and outlet. Inside the room there are 36 temperature sensors which are hanged on a thin iron stick. Do you think it is necessary to model all the thin stickes in the room so that I can get good validation result? I use CFX4.3
Tadiwos 

July 27, 2001, 06:32 
Re: Model enqury

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thin? What's thin...?
Astrid 

July 27, 2001, 08:08 
Re: Model enqury

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

There are thin metal roads which supports the 36 thermocouples sensors. Is it necessary to model this roads in order to have a good validation result?


July 27, 2001, 08:15 
Re: Model enqury

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Tadiwos,
I think astrid means what are their dimensions wrt the rest of the geometry. 

July 27, 2001, 09:58 
Re: Model enqury

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Room dimension 3m by 1.5m by 2m, inlet area 0.13sq.m, outlet area, 0.016sq.m. Thin wire diameter 1cm (used to hang thermocouples),Height of each thin wire, 1.6m Number of thinwires in the test room, 12
Thanks in advance for your help Tadiwos 

July 27, 2001, 10:50 
Re: Model enqury

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I really don't think it is worth it.


July 28, 2001, 16:53 
Re: Model enqury

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Tadiwos,
I agree with Herve but, if you are want to be sure and you have the time to check, you could run a test case with and without the rods. If there is little difference you know that you can fairly skip the rods. If not then you might be in trouble in creating a geometry. Good luck, Astrid, 

July 28, 2001, 17:54 
Re: Model enqury

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

(1). There is this problem. If the local flow coming toward the sensor happen to be along the vertical thin rod direction, then the existence of the rod will modify the flow field. (2). Then there is another problem. The conductivity of the metal rod is much higher than that of the air. So, the existence of the thin rod will definitely modify the temperature field. That is, the temperature field around the thin rod will be more uniform because of the high conductivity. So, the measurement might be incorrect. (3). So, there is a wake effect, and the high conductivity effect. This can be especially important if the mass flow is low, and the flow field is sensitive to the room temperature distribution.


July 30, 2001, 05:32 
Re: Model enqury

#9 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I agree with John, however, modelling such a small element (here a series of small geometry elements) might be difficult from a meshing point of view due to the small scale of the rod. Therefore You ought to run a simple model first and see how it goes in comparison with your exp. data prior to investing, if needed, in a more expensive simulation.


July 31, 2001, 04:28 
Re: Model enqury

#10 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Doesn't it depend on what kind of accuracy you want?
I can't fell a few tenths of a degree difference. So if it is for climate control it doesn't matter whether T=22.3 C or 22.35 C I would think. It also depends what kind of temperature gradients you expect. Is one side of the room 100 C and the other 10 C? Or is it more like 3020 C? 

July 31, 2001, 08:08 
Re: Model enqury

#11 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Dear Bart,
The working temperature range is about 2035 

July 31, 2001, 08:09 
Re: Model enqury

#12 
Guest
Posts: n/a

And what is the resolution in T that you're interested in?


July 31, 2001, 09:38 
Re: Model enqury

#13 
Guest
Posts: n/a

it is about 0.1 degre celcious


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Centrifugal Pump and Turbulence Model  Michiel  CFX  12  January 25, 2010 04:20 
Problems bout CFD model of biomass gasification, Downdraft gasifier  wanglong  FLUENT  2  November 26, 2009 00:27 
help for different between les model (subgridscale model)  liuyuxuan  FLUENT  1  October 2, 2009 15:25 
Grid resolution for fullscale and down scaled model  gravis  Main CFD Forum  0  October 2, 2009 10:27 
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable kepsilon Model  Jonas Larsson  FLUENT  5  March 13, 2000 04:27 