CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

adding source term confusion

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 9, 2001, 02:09
Default adding source term confusion
  #1
tedmcc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello

I am confused about adding the source term in the command file.

I set up a 3D problem of 2 phase flow (air and water). I want to inject, through a source term, a cold stream consisting of both phases into a geometry containing hot fluid.

If known

- the flow rate/ volume composition for each phase

- the velocity and

- inlet temperature,

1. does the size of the USER3D patch defined matter the relationship between flow rate and velocity? I mean the velocity was calculated based on the flow rate and the area of original inlet device present in the real system.

2. I am very confused about which type of sources to specify. Is it "TOTAL", "TOTAL FOR PHASE" or ???

Please help! Thanks.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2001, 06:57
Default Re: adding source term confusion
  #2
Sascha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1. Forget the usage of USER3D patches, We have made very bad experiences using them via IPALL. 2. The sources shall be defined via USRSRC total for each phase... But when you add mass take care that you have to add source terms for several equations...
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 11, 2001, 03:47
Default Re: adding source term confusion
  #3
tedmcc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Sascha

1 . could you elaborate a bit more on the bad experience on USER3D-patch and IPALL?

2 . When adding sources through USRSRC, does that mean there's no need to set user3d patch but set an IP location where the source term is, right?

Thank you for your help.

  Reply With Quote

Old   August 13, 2001, 08:52
Default Re: adding source term confusion
  #4
Sascha
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1. The USER-3D patch has never worked properly in my tests. Mostly I had needed to set two different patches at the same location (porous and USER-3D). And it had been a very big problem to access the IP of the USER-3D. So I recommend to use geometry function or pointer functions set in a User-Scalar.

2. Really the best is to use IP locations or any pointer function first set by USRINT and all teh time used within the program. So you can be sure to set the coprrect source term...
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 27, 2001, 05:05
Default Re: adding source term confusion
  #5
raymond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For the USER3D, I have applied it for a long time. It can work well with simple source term, such as constant heat source. For complex source term, the best way is using USESCR subroutine. It's more flexible than USER3D. I nerver meet the problem of IP with CFX4.2, but the IP must be applied carefully on the complex geometry.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
swak4foam building problem GGerber OpenFOAM Installation 54 April 24, 2015 16:02
momentum source term zwdi FLUENT 13 December 5, 2013 18:58
DxFoam reader update hjasak OpenFOAM Post-Processing 69 April 24, 2008 01:24
DecomposePar links against liblamso0 with OpenMPI jens_klostermann OpenFOAM Bugs 11 June 28, 2007 17:51
Adding a momentum source term segersson OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 5 March 3, 2006 00:06


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42.