
[Sponsors] 
August 29, 2001, 02:47 
mass flow boundaries

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi everybody! I am having problems specifying mass flow boundaries at the inlet. Can anyone help me with this? Have a nice day, everyone


August 29, 2001, 04:04 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hi,
Can you explain you problem further? Jon 

August 29, 2001, 04:17 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

One phase turbulent flow entering a 2D bend (nice and long straight channels on either side of bend  inlet at the bottom channel, outlet at the top). I am using CFX4.4.
What I really want to obtain in flow separation right after the bend. I have run this specifying the inlet as an inlet, using the default turbulent intesity. I have tried running it both as a steady state and transient case. Neither gave separation. (Actually, the steady state case did before it had converged good. When the convergence got better = after more iterations, the separation effect dissapeared). CFX Support suggested I use a mass flow boundary as the inflow condition, but the program won't let me do this, so I'm probably doing it wrong. So my question(s) is: How do I specify mass flow boundaries at the inlet, and how do I obtain flow separation after the bend? 

August 29, 2001, 05:57 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

You will need to use a lowReynolds number turbulence model to achieve seperation around the bend, if indeed it exists. Therefore you will need your mesh such that the y+ is less than 1.0, or perhaps 3.0, if you are using Wilcoxtype models.


August 29, 2001, 06:19 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Jon, I am using the Low Re number model, with y+ less than 1.0.


August 30, 2001, 02:31 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

(1). Flow separation is a function of the geometry, and Reynolds number. We need to know these two parameters first. (2). A bend in a channel does not guarantee the existence of flow separation. (3). Try a 90 degree sharp turn first (no rounded corner). (4). What is your mesh size and the mesh distribution around the bend? (5). If the axial (streamwise) mesh is coarse around the bend, you will not get accurate solution. (6). What was the turbulence model used? The twoequation kepsilon model has the tendency to give more diffusive solution. (7). What was the numerical scheme used? Upwind scheme is also very diffusive. (8). All of these can give you a smoother or better solution. (unfortunately, you are after the flow separation) (9). If you try to hide information from the readers, it will only take longer to get the right help. (a message to all readers seeking for help)


September 3, 2001, 03:56 
Re: mass flow boundaries

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

John, thank you for your reply, didn't mean to hide anything from you
1) Reynolds number: 750 000 Geometry: 180 degree 2D bend, width 50mm, inner radius is 25mm, outer radius is 75mm. 150mm straight channel before bend,300mm after bend. 4) Around the bend I have 80 mesh seeds uniformly distributed. In the boundary layer I have used the tabular option, and distributed 27 mesh seeds, also within y+ = 1. In the rest of the cross section (ydir) I have distributed 20 mesh seeds using two way bias, L2/L1 =2. The lower and upper straight channels have 80 and 160 uniform mesh seeds, respectively. 6) Low Re number 7) I have only used the default, hybrid 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
mass flow rate not conserved in turbomachine, interface defined wrong?  wildli  FLUENT  2  July 8, 2015 11:38 
Mass flow rate: calculation v/s computation  beguxa  FLUENT  4  June 8, 2013 16:17 
Net mass flow inlet vs outlet  Nigui28  FLUENT  1  August 12, 2011 10:09 
Running dieselFoam error  adorean  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  118  March 12, 2009 15:37 
Determine mass flow rate along flow path  Atit Koonsrisuk  CFX  2  October 5, 2003 04:47 