CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Please compare between CFX 5.5 and CFX 4.4

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 8, 2002, 04:52
Default Please compare between CFX 5.5 and CFX 4.4
  #1
p
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Please compare between CFX 5.5 and CFX 4.4. If i need to solve industrial problems about CFD. Please suggest me to buy CFX Product.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2002, 10:10
Default Re: Please compare between CFX 5.5 and CFX 4.4
  #2
Holidays
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
CFX-4.4:structured multiblock mesh approach, segregated solvers (inc. AMG), vast quantity of open routines for the user to code extra models, conditions etc. large amount of physical and chemical model.

CFX-5.5: unstructured/structured, fully coupled solver, expression language, fortran routine coming in now and most CFX-4 models being transfered in the code. Very robust I find.

CFX-4 is still very much used by people doing chemical process and multiphase flows, one of the areas in which CFX excels compare to competition, but CFX-5 is catching up. As far as I have understood this will be the case in the next release due next May/June... CFX-5 has taken over completely in mechanical, automotive and aero applications in general. But check on their web site www.cfx.aeat.com
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2002, 16:43
Default Re: Please compare between CFX 5.5 and CFX 4.4
  #3
Neale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just to add to the other poster's comments. While CFX-5 is catching up to CFX-4 in terms of the number of models, probably the biggest gap is Radiation modelling. You can't do discrete ordinates or Monte Carlo radiation modelling in CFX-5 yet. The May/June release that the other poster mentions includes many new multiphase features including free surface heat transfer and surface tention, MFR and GGI with multiphase, and others...

CFX-5 also has many features that CFX-4 does not have. It can run structured and unstructured grids, has mesh adaptation, has far better scalable parallelisation, a more flexible post processor, modern programmable command language (uses PERL!), expression language that eliminates the need for user fortran in many cases, much more flexible additional variable/scalar implementation... etc...

Neale
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX 4.4: NAG Library Link to CFX subroutine... Robin K CFX 2 September 21, 2005 10:40
Help: 2D model in CFX 5.5 Dejun Jing CFX 1 July 24, 2002 00:25
2D in CFX 5.5 (2) Astrid CFX 5 December 21, 2001 01:09
Tecplot & CFX 4.4 S. H. Kim CFX 3 December 20, 2001 07:07
CFX 4.4 installation problem Pandu Sattvika CFX 1 December 1, 2001 05:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37.