|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi all,
In CFX 5.5 I have run a case with a cilinder from which the outer wall rotates with a certain constant speed. I have run it as a stationary case. The boundary condition on the outer wall is such that the specified u,v,w velocities provide the correct angular velocity. Now in CFX-Post, when I view the global velocity on the outer rotating wall I obtain a global range between the correct minimum speed (= 0) and about 60-70% of the angular velocity. When I plot the local range I get the correct range between 0 and the angular velocity. (Btw, this does not only apply for the angular velocity, it applies for all variables) Does anyone know what this difference means? Why is the local range broader than the global range? Astrid |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
This sounds like it's because conservative values are used for the ranges instead of hybrid. Mike
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It sounds like a code bug for me.
cfd guy |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe. But which of them do I see? And where can I swith between both? Where is the button?
I want to be in controlllllll, Astrid |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hybrid values aren't available for local ranges in 5.5. I believe 5.5.1 has the option to pick between the two.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Toggle between Hybrid (wall boundaries applied) and Conservative values (Raw calculated values) from within the Variable Editor in cfx post 5.5.
Michael Bo |
|
|
||
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
So, it is a bug?
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I don't think this will make any difference to the values used for local ranges, but you can try it and see.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i guess it depends how you define a bug. It's works as implemented, but maybe not how some people would expect it to work.
|
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 15, 2013 06:08 |
| Convergence moving mesh | lr103476 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 30 | November 19, 2007 14:09 |
| Transient simulation not converging | skabilan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | September 17, 2007 17:48 |
| IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 02:58 |
| Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 18:07 |