CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

B.C. on surface or solid

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   April 16, 2002, 08:37
Default B.C. on surface or solid
  #1
Soren
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Is it possibel to change a part of the geometry in CFX-build 5.5 without deleting the solid/domain ?

Like say moving a surface without one have to apply all the boundary conditions again !

Furthermore, is it possible to clearup the geometry, like when a lot of change to the model has happende (deleted lines and surfaces) ?

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Soren

  Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2002, 16:34
Default Re: B.C. on surface or solid
  #2
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1) in principle not, as far as I know. The only thing you can do is create a new solid and use that as a cutout-solid from the first solid. But I think this is not what you want.

2) You can delete a solid without re-applying all the boundary conditions again. If you have deleted e.g. Surface 32 and created a new Surface 32 on the new position, you don't have to re-apply the BC.

You might be in trouble if you have created a solid from a bunch of surfaces and deleted all these original surfaces right away. Then you end up with surfaces named like Solid 1.2. Then, if you delete Solid 1, I guess you will have to redefine all the BCs as the numbers get mixed up. But I am not sure.

I advice you 1) not to delete the original surface upon creating a solid, 2) If you define a BC, define it on an original surface and not on the solid 1.### surfaces.

3) What do you mean by clean-up? You can renumber the points, curves and surfaces, but then you definitely have to re-apply all the BC's.

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2002, 19:50
Default Re: B.C. on surface or solid
  #3
Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A nice trick is to create you geometry and mesh in Mesh Only Mode. Create named 2D regions for all the boundary conditions that you need then write out a Definition file. Create a second database using Import Mesh mode, import the Def file, and then define all the domains and boundary conditions. Now, if you want to change your geometry you can just modify the Mesh Only Mode database and write out another definition file. You must make sure that you do not change the names or delete any of the 2D or 3D regions. If you overwrite the definition file containing the first geometry with the one containing the new geometry, then when you re-open you Import Mesh database it will import the new geometry.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2002, 12:12
Default Re: B.C. on surface or solid
  #4
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Soren,

You cannot modify the solid without deleting it, but you can modify it without messing up your boundaries.

One method is to keep define boundary conditions on the original surfaces that make up your B-Rep (as Astrid has suggested).

The other is to dissassemble your solid (deleting the original) and make the modifications. If you do not create more surfaces (by breaking existing ones for instance), but only modify the existing ones, you can get the same surface numbering on the solid by renumbering the modified surfaces to have the same number as the original. By doing this, Build will assemble the surfaces into a new B-Rep. Also make sure to use the same number to identify the B-Rep when you create it.

Since the boundary conditions are refernced to the solid faces by number, this will give you the desired effect.

Regards, Robin

PS: Mike - you will have the same problem with the 2-D regions moving in the mesh-only mode.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2002, 12:28
Default Re: B.C. on surface or solid
  #5
mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The idea of using Mesh Only Mode was to remove the issues of surface numbering. You could change your geometry and not worry about keeping the same surface numbering, as long as you re-create your 2D Regions using the same names. Yes, you'll still have to re-create the 2D regions, but this can be a lot quicker than re-creating all your boundary conditoins for complex cases - is this what you meant Robin or did i miss something?
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 18, 2002, 20:36
Default Re: B.C. on surface or solid
  #6
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
In the full mode, you never have to delete and re-create your boundary conditions, just modify them selecting the new surfaces. Same with mesh-only mode, so the amount of work is the same (more if you consider the need to re-import the mesh).

Robin
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Gmsh] Error : Self intersecting surface mesh, computing intersections & Error : Impossible velan OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 October 22, 2015 11:05
[snappyHexMesh] Add additional boundary layers to complex stl surface tobijingles OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 October 26, 2011 10:45
Free surface B.C. and I.C. John N. CFX 3 March 11, 2009 05:51
Solid Surface and Fluid Results Plot CK FLOW-3D 2 November 12, 2008 00:32
free convection heat transfer from a heated horizontal surface through a liquid to a thin cooled fin Kaushik FLUENT 1 May 8, 2000 06:47


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:58.