CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 11, 2002, 12:06
Default Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid
  #1
boji
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hello there,

I'm modelling a gas combustion furnace, a horizontal cylinder with a burner in one end in the center, and outlet in another end. And I'm using CFX 5.5.1.

Q1, I found the flow field is not symmetric. Is there anyone else experienced the similar phenomena? What can I do to improve/correct this? (I'm not going to use a 2D simulation.)

Q2, If I consider a conducting solid (Fireclay) around the furnace, heat transfer coefficient BC. With a small timescale for "energy" equations, it would converge with a wrong T field. While if I apply a larger timescale (e.g. 10s), the convergence is very slow. I played around with "Solid time scale factor" etc., there was little help. Could anybody give me some suggestions on this?

Thanks in advance.

bo
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 11, 2002, 18:08
Default Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid
  #2
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Q1. When you unstructured grid is not symmetric, your solution will not be completely symmetric.

Q2. Have you tried to run with only the energy equation while using a huge timestep?

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2002, 08:05
Default Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid
  #3
boji
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you.

I thought solving a heat conduction problem would be fast.

The calculation is running now with 60s for energy equations and 1s for the others. The RMS for energy in solid is about 2.3*10^-4 and converging very slow (rate=0.99 or even 1.00). Energy imbalance is about 50% in the solid area but decreasing slowly. Any more suggestions?

I found out that you also attended the conference in Strasbourg, in an earlier post. Do you have any news of the CD?

Best regards bo
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2002, 15:17
Default Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid
  #4
Neale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Run with an even higher timestep on the energy equation, like 1.0E20. If the heat transfer is diffusion dominated it may take quite some time to converge with a small timestep.

Also, what is the Prantdl number for your fluid? If the thermal boundary layer is much thicker than the hydrodynamic (i.e. Pr>>1) then you will have to use quite large energy timesteps.

If the fluids equations are solved well enough then you might also try turning them off with the "solve fluids =f" (maybe also solve tke eps=f) expert parameter and then just solve the energy equation with that large timestep.

As far as the symmetry of the flow field goes, how were you ensuring this? Did you use symmetry boundary conditions? If not, then symmetry is not guaranteed.

Neale
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 12, 2002, 18:31
Default Re: Qs on symmetry of flow field, conducting solid
  #5
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No news of the CD. Ask the helpdesk.

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Qualitative Observations of Mean Flow Field Josh CFX 4 July 9, 2010 16:52
Disturbed flow field at outlet boundary (Multiphase flow through pipe) Michiel CFX 17 April 21, 2010 10:14
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? diaw Main CFD Forum 105 November 20, 2009 05:19
heat conducting in a solid domain Rogerio Fernandes Brito CFX 0 March 18, 2008 18:20
how 2 freeze 1 phase flow field & start lagrangian KK CFX 5 February 14, 2008 17:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:13.