CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Is it normal?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 25, 2002, 10:01
Default Is it normal?
  #1
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
A pipe is 20cm long with a diameter of 2cm. The inlet velocity is 0.4m/s(V direction). Now I found the values of RMS for velocity U and W are nearly the same for each iteration although the solution is converged. Is it an normal phenomena? Thanks.

David
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2003, 09:57
Default Re: Is it normal?
  #2
Sascha Becker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe your grid is too coarse to get a converged solution --> refine grid and rerun the case.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2003, 20:54
Default Re: Is it normal?
  #3
Neale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What exactly do you mean by "values of RMS for velocity U and W"?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 6, 2003, 21:59
Default Re: Is it normal?
  #4
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi Neale

Thanks for your interests. When I am looking at the out file for each iteration, I found RMS Res for U-mom and W-mom always have the same varying value. I also checked the out file of Tutorial 18, it as well has similar results. By the way, may I ask you another question about scale-up problem. For example, I got a converged solution on a short pipe (20cm and 2cm). Now I want to extend the pipe to ten times but the pipe diameter is kept the same (200cm and 2cm). However I can not get a converged solution in the extended pipe. So what's the reason? Are there any ways to solve the problem. All settings in CFX 5.5.1 for both cases are the exactly same. The max. mesh length is 0.4cm and stretch factor is (1 0.5 1), inflation is also considered with defaults. Thanks

David
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 7, 2003, 21:27
Default Re: Is it normal?
  #5
Neale
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
David,

1) What timestep are you using?

2) Are you running high resolution advection or upwind?

For the long pipe you should be using something like 200 cm divided by a typical velocity scale. If you are running high resolution or specified blend factor then you need to ensure that you have a fairly decent grid to get a reliable converged result.

Neale

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF to Access Wall Normal Concentration Gradient Daniel Tanner Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 4 February 18, 2015 15:35
Normal vector, slope and aspect angle g_niro Main CFD Forum 0 February 2, 2011 18:24
my stl surface is seen as just a line rcastilla OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 January 6, 2010 02:30
NACA0012 geometry/design software needed Franny Main CFD Forum 13 July 7, 2007 15:57
How to get normal vector to the face? Viatcheslav Kulikov FLUENT 0 January 19, 2006 15:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:03.