CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Vanishing volume fraction

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 9, 2003, 18:58
Default Vanishing volume fraction
  #1
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I am working on a CFD simulation with two phases (two gases), one inlet, and two outlets. The volume fraction of the first is around 0.99, the second is around 0.01. You can argue about if one should perform multiphase calculations with such a low fraction but that is not what I want to discuss here.

The problem is that at the inlet the fluids enters the domain with the ratio as specified above but that the smallest fraction never ever reaches the outlets. Due to some strange kind of reason, the volume fraction vanishes (<1e-10). I have changed the scheme, performed double precision, switched the multiphase model between two continuous phases and a continous/dispersed couple (I do not want to use the homogeneous option because I need two velocity fields). No satisfying result at all.

What is hapening here? Any suggestion?

Thanks for reading, Astrid.
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2003, 09:47
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #2
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey Astrid, I'd call the guys at CFX as we had a similar problem. We were runnning CFX551 and it was a homogeneous free surface problems were we had a loss of fluid with a moving mesh. It may be the same problem I'm not sure. I spoke to a guy called Chris Staples. He was very helpful. Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 14, 2003, 11:25
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #3
Jon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is this well converged?

How are you measuring the VF in the domain?

Which numerical schemes are you using for Vf and other varaibles?

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2003, 05:53
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #4
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We started from a converged singlephase solution. From there it is does not converge very well for the small volume fraction. The large fraction converges properly. As the smallest fraction at the outlet is approximately zero, the balance is always at 100%.

We performed upwind and high resolution scheme. THe latter was slightly better.

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2003, 04:43
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #5
Jon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If none of the small volume fraction have reached the outlets, I would advise running it on further.

Have you had a look where the smaller phase has deposited?
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 19, 2003, 17:33
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #6
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
- Running it any further had no result.

- The smaller fraction hasn't deposited anywhere. It has just disappeared. The folks from CFX are currently working on it.......

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 20, 2003, 11:01
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #7
Bob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Astrid, keep us posted if you geta result !! bob
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 5, 2003, 17:23
Default Re: Vanishing volume fraction
  #8
Astrid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Bob,

It is all about drag. If the drag is too low or even zero, then the solver tries to reduce one volume fraction.

Astrid
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11
alphaEqn.H in twoPhaseEulerFoam cheng1988sjtu OpenFOAM Bugs 14 September 18, 2011 13:46
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases paean OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 November 14, 2008 22:14
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:28.