|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| I-Radiation | #Its | Vol Chg | Sur Chg | %Lost %Imbal | | Gray | 3 | 0.0E+00 | 1.3E-03 | 0.00 2.71 | Comes from a .out file applying Discrete Transfer Method. +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | I-Radiation | | %SD Sur | %SD Vol | %Lost %Imbal | | Full Spectrum | | 5.0E+01 | 1.0E+02 | 0.00 0.34 | +----------------------+------+---------+---------+------------------+ Comes from a .out file applying Monte Carlo Method. What's the meanings of "Vol Chg", "Sur Chg", and "%SD" ? Are they also a standard of convergence, how accurate for the figures 0.0E+00, 1.3E-03(DT) and 50, 100(Monte Carlo) here? If the convergence is not nice enough, how can I improve it? Thank you in advance. Bo |
|
|
||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q on some abbreviations (radiation models) | ABo | CFX | 0 | May 25, 2004 03:17 |
| models of radiation | dani | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 25, 2001 19:33 |
| models of radiation | dory | FLUENT | 0 | December 26, 2000 11:00 |
| HELP!!!! RADIATION MODELS IN NATURAL CONVECTION | dory | FLUENT | 0 | December 5, 2000 12:38 |
| HELP!!! RADIATION MODELS IN NATURAL CONVECTION | dory | FLUENT | 0 | November 29, 2000 10:51 |