# asymmetric solution generated by symmetric problem

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 16, 2004, 09:45 asymmetric solution generated by symmetric problem #1 Twiti Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, everyone Now, I am doing with a geometrically symmetric problem in CFX-5.7, but got asymmetric solutions either with k-e or SST turbulence model. The problem involves only fluid flow and heat transfer. It's sure that boundary conditions and mesh are both symmetric. Physically, a symmetric solution is expected. Is it a problem due to poor mesh generation or some thing else?

 September 16, 2004, 16:40 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #2 Robin Guest   Posts: n/a It is also possible that asymmetry in your mesh could cause what you are seeing. If you make your mesh symmetric or further refine it, a symmetric solution may be realized. Keep in mind, however, that symmetric boundary conditions and geometry do not necessarily imply a symmetric flow. For instance, flow in a diffuser may separate from one side only, remaining attached on the other. In such a flow, the 'symmetric' solution is unstable and therefore is not realized. It's like standing a pencil on it's tip. Regards, Robin

 September 16, 2004, 22:02 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #3 HK Guest   Posts: n/a I think the only practical way to use axi-symmetry geometry for cfx 5.7 is to use mesh build/build in 4 if the problem is very complex. I am just wondering what did you use to generate the mesh? HK

 September 16, 2004, 22:24 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #4 Twiti Guest   Posts: n/a hi, Robin Thank you for you reply. The problem I am dealing with is a relative simple one without any separation and other unstable factors. Just now, I temporarily changed the two lateral walls to "Wall" type boundary, which both used to be "Symmetry" type, and got a expected symmetric solution. I wonder maybe that's the problem of the "Symmetry" bounday type?

 September 16, 2004, 22:28 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #5 Twiti Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, HK Thank you for you kindly answering. Right now, I use ICEM5 for mesh generation. Do you mean that, CFX-5 get use to the mesh built up by CFX-build, especially when the geometry is very complex?

 September 16, 2004, 22:44 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #6 HK Guest   Posts: n/a In ICEM, how difficult is to make 2 sets of identical mesh which will be used as symmetry for a? I think it is very difficult. So yes, still my earlier comments hold. HK

 September 19, 2004, 18:31 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #7 Glenn Horrocks Guest   Posts: n/a Hi HK, It is very easy to make 2 sets of identicle mesh in ICEM. You can transform an existing mesh group to a new location and it's done. Alternately if you mean create periodic boundary conditions with matching meshes on both faces, that can be done easily in ICEM too. And for the record, you can create 2D axisymmetric or planar meshes in ICEM. Basically you create a solid with one face being your 2D geometry, then you delete all the volume elements and the shell elements except the shell elements describing the 2D geometry, then you recreate the 2D volumes by sweeping the mesh along a line or an axis of revolution. Finally you have to manually sort the edge elements out into the correct parts. It sounds complex but it is quite easy. Regards, Glenn

 October 16, 2004, 19:12 Re: asymmetric solution generated by symmetric pro #8 SAM Guest   Posts: n/a how can be the two walls be symetry!!!!!!. it is wrong thats why u were getting wrong solution regards

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post bipulsaha FLUENT 1 July 6, 2011 07:51 siara817 STAR-CCM+ 3 April 4, 2011 08:44 anbuselvan FLUENT 1 January 18, 2009 05:00 Mukkarum Husain Main CFD Forum 0 January 7, 2009 09:46 Mark Phoenics 2 July 2, 2001 09:04

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02.