CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Yplus

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 27, 2005, 02:51
Default Yplus
  #1
Kali Charan Nayak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all I have a general query on wall function approach. Suppose I'm interested in getting a qualitative flow field and have yplus 300-400, how good is the predicted flow field using any turbulence model. I use RNG k-epsilon. I'm not interested in calculating wall shear stress also. In a nutshell, I want to know what is the guideline to use max yplus while using wall function approach.If one uses higher than that, what is the expected error & why?

Thanks, Kali
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 2005, 18:25
Default Re: Yplus
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

In general y+ can go up to 100-500, but it is case dependant. For instance near-wall resolution can affect the separation points predicted by the turbulence models, leading to large scale changes in the flow. Also, different turbulence models can predict different separation points which again lead to large scale changes in the flow. Therefore it is not possible to make generalisations as it is case dependant.

Can you describe your flow a bit more?

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 28, 2005, 02:38
Default Re: Yplus
  #3
Kali Charan Nayak
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The domain consists of a rotor and stator. The rotor rotates at about 14000 rpm. The fluid will have high swirl. I'm using RNG k-e model. There are many recirculating zones. My question is if the yplus is high (300-500), how reliable is the predicted flow field. What is the recommended yplus and why is that? The energy equation is also solved. How good will be the rotor work done on the fluid with this high yplus. Hope this give you more info. to help me.

Thanks, Kali
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 28, 2005, 19:40
Default Re: Yplus
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Many turbulence models have a problem with swirling flows. You may have to use a Reynolds Stress model or DES/LES to get accurate answers as no two-equation turbulence model in CFX is strong in modelling swirling flows. This problem has nothing to do with y+, it is the inherent inability of the simple models to handle non-isotropic turbulence.

Regards, Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to calculate Y+( Yplus) mohammad Main CFD Forum 3 January 11, 2011 23:23
which yplus (SST) sanchezz CFX 17 January 11, 2010 04:45
Who stole my Yplus? Chebeba CFX 4 March 23, 2006 04:18
X-Y plot of Yplus in Fluent 5.3 Luo FLUENT 24 April 11, 2000 06:07
heat transfer coefficients with "bad" yplus Andrew Main CFD Forum 4 April 8, 1999 04:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:16.