residence time distribution
Hi... I want to use a Particle Tracking approach to obtain the RTD of a vessel based on a steady state simulation. When doing this the mean residence time gets way to high. I used small particles with a density of 1 and added turbulent dispersion. I am not sure about adding additional forces.
Any hints to the problem or another suggestions on how to obtain a "lagrangian" residence time distribution? 
Re: residence time distribution
it it much easier to implement an Additional Variable "RDT" with unit [s] and transport equation. RDT is set "0" at all inlet.
Then you create a subdomain "RDT sub" over all and impement a source for RTD with 1 [s/s]. Now RDT will become greater with resident time. bye martin 
Re: residence time distribution
I aready tried the implementation of an additional Variable RTD. Analysing the spatial distribution of RTD at the outlet of my reactor gives the right mean residence time, but just a rough approximation of the distribution (too coarse grid??) and a too narrow distribution (probably due to numerical diffusion effects). That why this approach seems not very powerful to me.
markus 
Re: residence time distribution
your particle tracking can't be better than your grid  so this would be the problem with your results. Diffusion effects shouldn't be if you use ADVECTION SCHEME: high res

Re: residence time distribution
Hi... How to get residence time distribution in cfxpost? thanks.

Re: residence time distribution
I'd run a transient simulation with a frozen flowfield where you solve a transport equation for an additional variable (scalar). Use pulse or step input and then monitor the massflow average of this quantity over time at the outlet.
markus 
All times are GMT 4. The time now is 18:36. 