Mesh Stiffness Option for Mesh Deformation

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 9, 2006, 09:00 Mesh Stiffness Option for Mesh Deformation #1 Ste_Lakey Guest   Posts: n/a I am returning to a problem I encountered previously regarding the modelling of an oscillating aerofoil, and the mesh stiffness when using a prescribed sinusoidally varying oscillation. In the manual it suggests the following for mesh stiffness: 1 [m^3 s^-1]/Wall Distance Could anyone expand further as to what this term will do, particularly in relation to the term Wall Distance (does this require substituting with a value based on my mesh geometry?). Thanks in advance

 January 10, 2006, 10:41 Re: Mesh Stiffness Option for Mesh Deformation #2 Mike Guest   Posts: n/a The mesh stiffness controls which parts of the mesh will deform. The absolute value is not important - so a constant mesh stiffness of 1 or 1 million will give the same result. What is important is how the mesh stiffness varies throughout the domain. Areas with a lower stiffness will deform more that areas with a high stiffness. Generally speaking, you want the mesh near the walls to remain stiff so that your boundary layer mesh remains "nice"; therefore the volume mesh away from the walls will deform to any motion of the boundaries. Wall Distance is a variable equal to the distance from the nearest wall boundary. So a mesh stiffness = 1/Wall Distance will keep the boundary layer mesh stiff and cause deformations to be absorbed in the volume mesh. Another useful formula for mesh stiffness is: 1/Volume of Finite Volumes This will make small elements stiff - the boundary layer usually has small elements. Also, elements that have already deformed a lot and are close to folding will become stiff. M Omran likes this.

 January 10, 2006, 11:19 Re: Mesh Stiffness Option for Mesh Deformation #3 Ste_Lakey Guest   Posts: n/a Thanks Mike, will give these a go

 January 19, 2006, 17:33 Re: Mesh Stiffness Option for Mesh Deformation #4 Ersin Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, depending on the geometry you are deforming it could be that there no difference between the formulations <1/wall distance> or <1/volume of finite volumes>! Perhaps you can also try the formulation <1/wall distance^n> with n > 2

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Flaky CFX 21 October 28, 2010 18:16 tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55 Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10 James CFX 10 September 12, 2006 03:16 Miguel Baritto CFX 4 August 31, 2006 12:02

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05.