Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 13, 2006, 08:00 Coarsening Rate for Radiation #1 Forrest Guest   Posts: n/a Hi all, I am wondering something about the coarsening rate in cfx5.7.1 solver. The intension of it is to reduce the radiation elements in order to same computing time. The problem is that when I model a thin participating solid and the cell numbers on the thickness direction are only about 25 or 35 (hex), if this direction is divided by the default coarsening rate (64) I should have less than 1 radiation element along the thickness, this is confusing because the solver doesn't show any message about this and continue the simulation. While if this is the way the coarsening algorithm does, I want about 15 radiation elements along the thickness, so my coarsening rate has to be 2, or even without coarsening. This makes the simulation time much longer than a normal calculation. Am I wrong to estimate it by this way? Thanks a lot Regards, Forrest

 February 13, 2006, 10:32 Re: Coarsening Rate for Radiation #2 opaque Guest   Posts: n/a Dear Forrest, The coarsening algorithm is not deterministic..You control the target (which may not be achieved under multiple scenarios) coarsening rate, and the CFX solver tries to give you that.. It does not have fine controls on how it coarsens boundary elements, interior elements, or direction of the coarsening. The coarsening does not cross domain boundaries. If you have a mesh with 10 elements, and you set a coarsening target coarsening rate of a million you get 1 element, same if you set it to 64 (default).. It cannot of course coarsen below 1 element.. Good luck, Opaque..

 February 13, 2006, 10:42 Re: Coarsening Rate for Radiation #3 Forrest Guest   Posts: n/a Opaque, thanks a lot for your answering, you are helpful always. So if I have 20 cells across one direction of a domain and I used a target coarsening rate 10 (say the actual coarsening rate is the same), it doesn't mean that I have 2 radiation elements along that direction because the algorithm is not deterministic. But how do I judge I have enough radiation elements to resolve radiation along that direction? Regards, Forrest

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Xavier Ponticq CFX 4 September 12, 2012 18:49 romance CFX 4 October 26, 2009 14:41 flybird FLUENT 0 May 24, 2007 10:44 Saturn FLUENT 0 December 10, 2004 05:18 La S. Hyuck CFX 1 May 23, 2001 00:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:17.