CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > CFX

fluid-porous interface

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 14, 2006, 16:12
Default fluid-porous interface
  #1
strider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi, I wish to work with a fluid-porous interface but when i get to the point of choosing the Interface Sides, I cannot choose any because there are no «valid domains».

I first thaught that since my porous region was a subdomain, it could not work, so I changed it for a domain that was completely porous. But this operation did not solve the problem.

Have you ever seen this problem before? Are there conditions for the fluid-porous interface that I don't respect or something?

Thanks a lot, any help will be apreciated.

strider
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2006, 16:52
Default Re: fluid-porous interface
  #2
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear strider,

The fluid porous domain interface only exist if you have at least one fluid and one porous domain.

It is not supported when you are setting up your porous loss model via the subdomain option within a fluid domain.

How many domains do you have? Fluids? Porous?

Opaque
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2006, 14:29
Default Re: fluid-porous interface
  #3
strider
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you Opaque, it was the subdomain thing and I solved the problem.

strider
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2019, 00:53
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Dharavath Nagesh
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: chennai
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 7
nagesh56 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by strider
;76923
Thank you Opaque, it was the subdomain thing and I solved the problem.

strider
can you please tell me how you gave the interface between fluid and porous zone.I have same problem
nagesh56 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2019, 07:43
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Jiri
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 209
Rep Power: 13
Jiricbeng is on a distinguished road
A better approach is to create node to node mesh (in one part) and you do not have to deal with interface, just set the domain to be porous.
Jiricbeng is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 19, 2023, 15:41
Default
  #6
Member
 
SMN
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CANADA
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 16
mortazavi is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiricbeng View Post
A better approach is to create node to node mesh (in one part) and you do not have to deal with interface, just set the domain to be porous.
can you please explain this in more detail? how is this possible to have only one domain with node to node mesh?
mortazavi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2023, 19:47
Default
  #7
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 17,665
Rep Power: 143
ghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really niceghorrocks is just really nice
It just means a contiguous mesh. This means the mesh has connectivity through the interface and does not require a GGI.
__________________
Note: I do not answer CFD questions by PM. CFD questions should be posted on the forum.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fluid flow in porous material bjorson Main CFD Forum 1 January 31, 2011 08:33
Y plus in fluid fluid interface Subha CFX 4 March 4, 2008 09:56
spercritical fluid flow in porous media cachen FLUENT 3 November 10, 2007 03:20
Diffusion from fluid region into porous tissue. Lindz FLUENT 0 August 3, 2007 08:34
fluid solid interface Alex CFX 1 February 18, 2005 21:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38.