CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 12, 2007, 03:20
Default Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model
  #1
jorllam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi everyone,

I'm trying to model the flow around a wing with the kw SST turbulence model, but the problem is that momentum equation residuals stall at a value too high no matter which timestep I choose. It looks like the code is trying to solve some kind of transient effect like a wake or free shear layer and this effect isn't captured by the turbulence model although the timestep is increased.

Can anybody help me? Thank you all.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 12, 2007, 17:22
Default Re: Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model
  #2
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

Try: Using a larger physical timestep, then local timescale factor. If that still does not work then run the simulation as a true transient simulation using adaptive timestepping.

I have had some good results lately using the true transient approach for airfoil simulations which refused to converge steady state. The simulations take quite a bit longer but at least I get a converged result.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2007, 03:49
Default Re: Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model
  #3
jorllam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Glenn,

It seems the case converges running it as a transient simulation, but are these results comparable to steady state RANS model results? what if variables evolve with time? how can these fluctuations be included by the Reynolds averaging?

Anyway, thanks a lot Glenn. I really appreciate your help.
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 13, 2007, 16:51
Default Re: Stalling residuals in kw SST turbulence model
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

If the transient model does not reach a steady state then a steady state solution is not applicable so no comparison can be made. If you mean you are expecting the turbulence model to average out the fluctuations leaving a steady state solution - well, actually achieving that is a complicated question requiring a detailed knowledge of turbulence and its modelling. I recommend you have a look at turbulence text books such as "Turbulence Modelling for CFD" by Wilcox.

If the instability is small you may be able to achieve a steady state solution by either a coarser grid, using another spatial differencing scheme or the first order time differencing scheme if a transient simulation.

You also have to consider whether the fluctuations are significant. If the fluctuations do not affect parameters of importance (eg lift or drag) then the fluctuations do not matter. In this case all the fluctuations do is make achieving convergence more difficult.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 12 June 2, 2015 13:16
multiphaseInterFoam for RAS turbulence model chiven OpenFOAM Bugs 7 August 23, 2011 02:52
Turbulence Model and limitation to Reynolds number qascapri FLUENT 0 January 24, 2011 11:48
SST transitional turbulence model Ben Akih CFX 3 June 8, 2006 15:52
Advanced Turbulence Modeling in Fluent, Realizable k-epsilon Model Jonas Larsson FLUENT 5 March 13, 2000 04:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28.