CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 27, 2007, 10:48
Default Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ?
  #1
Felix
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello to you all CFDers,

I am modeling an axisymmetric diffuser with an inlet swirling flow. Experimentaly, the flow did not separate from the wall nor did it present a recirculation zone in the core. So far, the K-E model results I get are much closer to the experimental data than the SST ones (although not perfect) and that gets me a litle confused. In fact, the SST predicts a separation early in the diffuser causing a jet-type flow field and thus cannot predict anything correctly afterwards.

The case I am investigating was studied experimentaly by Clausen and numericaly by Armfield (late 80s/early 90s) and has a total divergence angle of 20 degrees. All the data is available on the Ercoftac database.

I haven't proved mesh independence yet but I took care of using Y+ < 2 for the SST and 25 < Y+ < 40 for the K-E. Has anyone ever simulated this case in SST ? What were the results ? How did you get them ? I'm getting more and more curious about the real predictive ability of the SST turbulence model.

Thanks to all, best regards,

Felix
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2007, 12:34
Default Re: Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ?
  #2
matej
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I did not modelled this case, but I've just spend all day putting together the results comparing k-eps and SST with experiments on swirling combustor and it seems to me, that non of the models is better than the other one. While tangential vel. profiles are closer to the measurements for SST, the size of recirculation zone is to my surprise better predicted by k-eps. not easy to decide.

maybe SAS has the answer....?

matej
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2007, 18:44
Default Re: Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ?
  #3
HekLer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Generally the two equation models on their own are not particularily suited to strongly swirling flows.

SST is a blend between k-epsilon and k-omega. If you throw the 25<y+<40 grid at SST it should behave similarly to k-epsilon.

That being said the early separation must be a result of the eddy viscosity prediction being less (flow is not as thick) which is tied to prediction of the local pressure gradient and mean velocity gradients.

One other thing to do is contact the CFX help desk and ask if this case has been run by them. It may have been.

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2007, 22:03
Default Re: Swirling flow in a diffuser: K-E over SST ?
  #4
Glenn Horrocks
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

k-epsilon has well-known deficiencies in modelling swirling flow. SST has some terms in it to account for swirling flows but if you want to model swirling flow with a RANS approach you should really consider the Reynolds stress models.

Glenn Horrocks
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swirl diffuser flow lpy2009 FLUENT 2 January 8, 2015 03:20
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 2 September 18, 2009 08:07
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? diaw Main CFD Forum 104 February 16, 2006 06:44
difference between swirling flow and vortex flow? lcw Main CFD Forum 0 August 22, 2005 09:47
Inviscid Drag at subsonic, subcritical Mach # Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 1 November 19, 2001 13:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:57.