CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Solver is finishing with huge Mach number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 12, 2007, 13:43
Default Solver is finishing with huge Mach number
  #1
Fonzie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hallo everyone,

my question today is dealing with an issue I have encountered already sveral times and that I have always connected with a bad mesh quality. I am calculating a flow with an inflow of about 36 m/sec, that is far below any transonic effects or something. However for some meshes I am getting the following solver warning and shortly after the residuals will drop to "infinity". +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | ****** Notice ****** | | The maximum Mach number currently is 4.273E+04. | | If this message persists and you experience robustness problems, | | consider setting the expert parameter 'max continuity loops' to 2. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+

I have used a mesh generated by ICEMCFD. I have generated a prism layer with 10 layers and the first node 1 mm away from the surface. I have generated these layers "at once" that is without any "split prism"-tactics or something. After that I have transformed the Prisms to Tetras and smoothed the whole stuff so the quality is fine. ICEM tells me that the quality of the mesh is fine, no errors, no possible problems and the element quality is alright, too.

So my question simply is - where is that large Mach number coming from and how can it be explained. Why would the solver calculate such unrealistic high flow velocities?

If anyone had the same problems or just knows what causes that stuff I am grateful for your answer.

Regards Fonzie
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2007, 15:15
Default Re: Solver is finishing with huge Mach number
  #2
Joe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are solving a subsonic compressible flow and your solution is diverging it may generate spurious high Ma warnings.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 23 August 6, 2014 03:50
Isentropic Mach number definition Turbomachine CFX 0 March 25, 2011 06:37
non-dimensional analysis in Fluent Endee FLUENT 8 September 7, 2005 16:16
High Mach number solver Oliver Gloth (Gloth) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 December 20, 2004 08:30
TVD scheme at low Mach number Axel Rohde Main CFD Forum 5 August 6, 1999 02:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28.