|
[Sponsors] |
March 14, 2007, 00:40 |
CCM+ vs CFX vs Fluent
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi I am a current user of CCM+, I am wondering what CFX and Fluent offers in terms of solver speed, meshing algorythm and user friendlyness. I use CFD in the building industry, so I am not too worried about the turbulence models used for mach > 10...
|
|
March 14, 2007, 03:18 |
Re: CCM+ vs CFX vs Fluent
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've worked with all 3 packages, and I think that CCM+ is an interesting and good choice.
You will probably see a merging of GUI's with regards to CFX and Fluent so that the both will use CFX-Pre and CFX-Post in the future. And that is for the better when you want to know about user friendliness. CFX post is to me the most user friendly post processing tool. But stick to CCM+ if you like it. The polyhedral mesher in CCM+ is good and the solver robustness is increasing, even though it is not yet as robust as CFX. But keep an eye on errors on bugs in ccm+. There should be more bugs in that program compared to the others. |
|
March 14, 2007, 15:04 |
Re: CCM+ vs CFX vs Fluent
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I expect Solver speed and parallel scalability would be better in CFX than CCM+, since it's a real CFX strength, but I don't have any benchmarks to confirm this. Anybody else compared speed between these two?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparison of fluent and CFX for turbomachinery | Far | CFX | 52 | December 26, 2014 18:11 |
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 28, 2012 02:54 |
Import CFX def into Fluent | eric_wang | FLUENT | 0 | April 18, 2011 13:14 |
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure | Omer | CFX | 9 | June 28, 2007 04:13 |
Jobs in cfd - fluent or cfx? | jobman | Main CFD Forum | 6 | July 5, 2006 15:02 |